[CWG-RFP3] Coordination of Subgroup 3

Mon Nov 3 22:14:24 UTC 2014

Hi Guru,

There are a few reasons why option 4 differ from option 1; i don't seem to
be making great headway with my libre office calc on the excel file + its
almost midnight here so i will explain below:

*In Option 4:*

- A relevant existing legal body (using IETF trust as an example) signs a
contract/agreement with ICANN to ultimately operate the IANA by the
community developed policy
- The various communities within ICANN define their required
SLA/deliverables which the external body signs in agreement with ICANN
- The community monitor and evaluate operations against SLA/deliverables as
required; and an internal process that clearly defines how dispute is
resolved is stated
- The external body only serves as the key holder that only get things
moved when there are clear indication of un-resolved dispute between the
respective communities and the IANA operator.

Cheers!

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Guru Acharya <gurcharya at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Seun,
>
> I thought Option 4 was captured in Option 1 with "Existing Legal Entity
> (I*)".
>
> Apologies if I haven't understood Option 4 correctly.
>
> I am attaching the xls file using which I created the diagram. Please
> modify it and add Option 4 if I have misunderstood.
>
> Regards,
> Guru
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guru,
>>
>> Thanks for this, just to be clear, is there any reason why you skipped
>> option 4?
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Guru Acharya <gurcharya at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> The list of variables (A to J) is an interesting starting point for the
>>> discussion. I feel these variables need to be woven in with the various
>>> structural options so that the constraints for each of the variables can be
>>> understood.
>>>
>>> I have tried to create a diagrammatic representation which hopefully
>>> captures and explains some of the variables and constraints. This is very
>>> similar to what Jordan Carter has already done but hopes to capture some of
>>> that in one page.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if I have represented the subsidiary variations
>>> correctly.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Guru
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you again for your support and commitment.
>>>>
>>>> 1.  As an initial matter, I would like to suggest that we have a
>>>> conference call of this subgroup on Thursday, November 6 from 14:00 to
>>>> 15:30 UTC.  I don't think there is enough time before Tuesday's call of the
>>>> CWG to have a subgroup.  If you cannot participate at this time, please
>>>> respond ASAP.  If the time doesn't work, we'll go to a Doodle poll, but I
>>>> think a call of this subgroup this week is critical to moving forward in a
>>>> timely fashion.
>>>>
>>>> 2.  I have created a draft document with a proposed list of topics that
>>>> need to be addressed by any proposal, along with several variables for each
>>>> topic.  I think it is important to identify the topics any proposal needs
>>>> to address before we move on to drafting any particular proposal(s).  A
>>>> great deal of this document is based on proposals drafted by Allan
>>>> McGillivray, for which I am exceedingly grateful.  I also tried to draw on
>>>> the active discussions on the general list up to this time.  This document
>>>> is only intended as a starting point, and can be put up in Google Drive
>>>> and/or a wiki by staff or by myself.
>>>>
>>>> 3.  I have also provided a draft document with pro's and con's and
>>>> questions relating to one of the key topics -- the status of the IANA
>>>> Operating Function -- and three potential variables (IANA stays as is, IANA
>>>> becomes a subsidiary of ICANN, IANA is independent of ICANN).  Again, this
>>>> document reflects contributions by Allan to  a very great extent, is only
>>>> intended as a starting point, and can be put into Google Drive and/or a
>>>> wiki.
>>>>
>>>> 4.  Allan also prepared a draft document of Objectives.  I have
>>>> included this document as well.
>>>>
>>>> 4. For clarity please use "Subject" lines that reflect the contents of
>>>> your email.  Please start new threads or rename threads if you are going
>>>> off in a new direction or diving into details on a particular subtopic,
>>>> rather than merely replying to a general email like this one.  That will
>>>> make it much easier to capture ideas without too much hunting.
>>>>
>>>> I look forward to comments and discussions of these documents and based
>>>> on these documents   (Of course, these documents do not reflect the views
>>>> of my employer (nor do Allan's contributions reflect the views of his
>>>> employer).)
>>>>
>>>> I hope this is helpful to our task.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Greg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
>> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt
>> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>
>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141103/32724a91/attachment.html>