[CWG-RFP3] Coordination of Subgroup 3

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Mon Nov 3 22:59:45 UTC 2014


Guru, Thank you for this, and for the prior document that Berry Cobb
transmitted to the group.  I think this is most helpful.

Seun, Thank you for your comments, which are most helpful as well.

Greg

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guru,
>
> There are a few reasons why option 4 differ from option 1; i don't seem to
> be making great headway with my libre office calc on the excel file + its
> almost midnight here so i will explain below:
>
> *In Option 4:*
>
> - A relevant existing legal body (using IETF trust as an example) signs a
> contract/agreement with ICANN to ultimately operate the IANA by the
> community developed policy
> - The various communities within ICANN define their required
> SLA/deliverables which the external body signs in agreement with ICANN
> - The community monitor and evaluate operations against SLA/deliverables
> as required; and an internal process that clearly defines how dispute is
> resolved is stated
> - The external body only serves as the key holder that only get things
> moved when there are clear indication of un-resolved dispute between the
> respective communities and the IANA operator.
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Guru Acharya <gurcharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Seun,
>>
>> I thought Option 4 was captured in Option 1 with "Existing Legal Entity
>> (I*)".
>>
>> Apologies if I haven't understood Option 4 correctly.
>>
>> I am attaching the xls file using which I created the diagram. Please
>> modify it and add Option 4 if I have misunderstood.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Guru
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guru,
>>>
>>> Thanks for this, just to be clear, is there any reason why you skipped
>>> option 4?
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Guru Acharya <gurcharya at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>
>>>> The list of variables (A to J) is an interesting starting point for the
>>>> discussion. I feel these variables need to be woven in with the various
>>>> structural options so that the constraints for each of the variables can be
>>>> understood.
>>>>
>>>> I have tried to create a diagrammatic representation which hopefully
>>>> captures and explains some of the variables and constraints. This is very
>>>> similar to what Jordan Carter has already done but hopes to capture some of
>>>> that in one page.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if I have represented the subsidiary variations
>>>> correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Guru
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you again for your support and commitment.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.  As an initial matter, I would like to suggest that we have a
>>>>> conference call of this subgroup on Thursday, November 6 from 14:00 to
>>>>> 15:30 UTC.  I don't think there is enough time before Tuesday's call of the
>>>>> CWG to have a subgroup.  If you cannot participate at this time, please
>>>>> respond ASAP.  If the time doesn't work, we'll go to a Doodle poll, but I
>>>>> think a call of this subgroup this week is critical to moving forward in a
>>>>> timely fashion.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2.  I have created a draft document with a proposed list of topics
>>>>> that need to be addressed by any proposal, along with several variables for
>>>>> each topic.  I think it is important to identify the topics any proposal
>>>>> needs to address before we move on to drafting any particular proposal(s).
>>>>> A great deal of this document is based on proposals drafted by Allan
>>>>> McGillivray, for which I am exceedingly grateful.  I also tried to draw on
>>>>> the active discussions on the general list up to this time.  This document
>>>>> is only intended as a starting point, and can be put up in Google Drive
>>>>> and/or a wiki by staff or by myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.  I have also provided a draft document with pro's and con's and
>>>>> questions relating to one of the key topics -- the status of the IANA
>>>>> Operating Function -- and three potential variables (IANA stays as is, IANA
>>>>> becomes a subsidiary of ICANN, IANA is independent of ICANN).  Again, this
>>>>> document reflects contributions by Allan to  a very great extent, is only
>>>>> intended as a starting point, and can be put into Google Drive and/or a
>>>>> wiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4.  Allan also prepared a draft document of Objectives.  I have
>>>>> included this document as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. For clarity please use "Subject" lines that reflect the contents of
>>>>> your email.  Please start new threads or rename threads if you are going
>>>>> off in a new direction or diving into details on a particular subtopic,
>>>>> rather than merely replying to a general email like this one.  That will
>>>>> make it much easier to capture ideas without too much hunting.
>>>>>
>>>>> I look forward to comments and discussions of these documents and
>>>>> based on these documents   (Of course, these documents do not reflect the
>>>>> views of my employer (nor do Allan's contributions reflect the views of his
>>>>> employer).)
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope this is helpful to our task.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Greg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
>>> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt
>>> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>>
>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt
> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141103/ee224b4d/attachment.html>


More information about the Cwg-rfp3 mailing list