[CWG-RFP3] Is there is a more suitable legal jurisdiction for an IANA subsidiary?

[Greg Shatan]

Alan,

Ordered by whom?  Under what circumstances?

Thanks.

Greg

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
wrote:

>  An issue I raised earlier: If IANA were a wholly owned subsidiary of
> ICANN incorporated in ANY jurisdiction, I suspect (but do not know) that
> ICANN, which is subject to US law, might be ordered to have its subsidiary
> take some action, negating the benefits of its incorporation and residence
> elsewhere.
>
> Alan
>
>
> At 03/11/2014 11:33 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:
>
> All:
>
> Here is Robert's second question (which I think also applies to the
> concept of a fully independent IANA):
>
>
>
> *For  option #2. - Is there is a  jurisdiction that ICANN has (or can
> obtain) legal status might be more suitable to use to create IANA as a
> subsidiary. Such an option might allow for the link to be a subsidiary of
> ICANN, but sever the legal link to the US. A negative, of course, would be
> moving the function and existing staff to a new part of the world.*
>
> Comments and discussion?
>
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141107/ed13980c/attachment.html>