[CWG-Stewardship] Update on the Integrated model.

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Fri Feb 20 23:18:14 UTC 2015


On 20-Feb-15 16:50, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
> My question:
>
>  
>
> Does this model provide for separability?
>
>  
>

First it provides structural separation in all configurations.  That is
a first level of severability and hopefully as much as really is ever
needed.  Additionally, in this model, ICANN would have the same ability
to pick another provider, or perhaps a redundant provider, just as the
names or protocols can now.  This is made possible by virtue of
structural  separation and the defintion of SLA/MOUs across a corporate
boundary.

Further levels of separability can, however, be obtained in the Shared
Service Arrangement configuration or the finally in the Free Standing
configuration.

Finally


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150220/7d522028/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list