[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA #46 - 12 May

Tue May 12 20:16:58 UTC 2015

Dear all, 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call #46 - 12 May are available here:
<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53773683>
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53773683

Kind regards,

Brenda

Action Items

-ACTION Staff: Update Punch list with results from call

-ACTION: Detailed session on fundamental questions to be scheduled for Thursday 14 or Tuesday 19
May.

- ACTION co-chair how to handle input from group on initial staff responses

- ACTION: Share additions to FAQ  (responses on questions Webinar) with group ASAP, goal is to
inform Public comment as much as possible

- ACTION:  Capture points on completeness of proposal to inform community 

- ACTION: co-chairs work with group, to work on mechanism to allow those groups entities not part of
chartering organisations to provide 
  input on final proposal 

- ACTION: Staff Capture points on completeness on punch list (6 May version)

- ACTION: Detailed session on fundamental questions re Separability to be scheduled for Thursday 14
or Tuesday 19 May.

- ACTION: Include timetable for discussion in agenda 14 May meeting

Notes

Notes and Agenda - CWG - Stewardship Meeting - 12 May 2015

1. Opening Remarks

No Participants on the audio

- Add new item update client committee

- Request to extend PC: Given timetable and underlying principle of getting proposal to community by
BA. 

- New timetable under development with Sidley

- Intense working days 28 and 29 May 2015

- Recent letter DOC by NTIA to ICG, talking about planning , timing and potential impact on end date
of 
current contract.  Intention to have  a call 

Checking action previous calls

- Go back to ICANN Finance on costing models. Note written by co-chair

- Various Sidley documents, to inform CWG.

- Request Sidley to develop first terms sheet for contract PTI to encapsulate SLE

Comment/update DT A, will receive current work flow. from ICANN and IANA

- Sidley requested to provide stress testing on PTI Board in different configuration and other
element

- co-chairs reached out to ICANN legal on punch list item 3 and 4 ( completed)

2. Public Comment

    a. Draft format of review template (attached)

Comments on Public comment tool: no comments

Start review comments now or after closure PC ?

Start with recording the input from PC right now.

Given dynamic document who controls it?

As it is circulated regularly, staff to maintain document.

Need for a reasonable process, to organise comment. 

Suggestion staff to prepare an initial response, CWG to reject, update, staff response 

ACTION: co-chair provide method on how to handle input from group on initial staff responses

    b. FAQ (to follow up on this Action item: develop FAQ to complement information provided in the
public comment forum)

FAQ are prepared on basis of Sidley Austin document. 

Intention is to add responses to FAQ, moving forward. 

Next branch of questions to be included in FAQ is responses to question raised during the webinar.

ACTION: Share additions to FAQ  (responses from Webinar) with group ASAP, goal is to inform Public
comment as much as possible

    c. Feedback or issues from CWG

PK: How to respond to those who feel proposal is not complete? and await responding to full
proposal?

View of co-chairs is that 2nd proposal is sufficient complete, to provide meaningful comment. Based
on response and ongoing work, 
proposal will be complete by BA meeting for chartering organisations to decide on proposal. 

Related item: CCWG  thinks requirements CWG will be reflected in CCWG proposal.

Proposal will only be complete with CCWG Accountability mechanisms in place

ACTION:  Capture points on completeness of proposal to inform community 

Comment: How will people not associated with chartering org provide their input during the 

Action: co-chairs work with group, to work on mechanism to allow those groups entities not part of
chartering organisations to provide input on final proposal 

ACTION: Include timetable in meeting 13 May

3. Punch List Updates

Item 1- 5

Sidley Scenario testing  related to April 16 memo.

What is more resilient model in case of bankruptcy

Item 6-10 ( DT N). Is this group meeting?

Working through Google docs, inclination is not to have a call

ACTION: Ongoing work though shared document

Item 11-16 ( DT C): 

Action DT C :Capture points and share on list to strike items from Punch list as done

Item 17-19

Status: dealt be by heads of terms by Sidley. 

ACTION Client Committee: Update by Thursday through client committee on terms sheet

ACTION: DTA to provide feed-back on first terms sheet on SLE

Escalation Mechanism (item 21-23) DTM/DT C

DT M Meeting on 13 May. 

DT C made some d=suggestions-> to be shared with DT M

If needed co-chair available to assist in DT C /DT M meeting

Item 24-29 Punch list (Avri)

Responses to punch list started, fundamental questions are still pending, such if IFR is going to
recommend, then wh is going to separate? 

Discussion needed to go through triggers

Other items are covered

Comment/Question: separability what does it mean: are we talking baout separating the operations or
stewardship?

Response: separability has NOT to do with stewardship, but with Function Operator. As a result
different possibilities. 

Significant work ongoing: understanding it is a work of the whole group. 

Fundamental questions to be scheduled at one point. 

Action: Detailed session on fundamental questions re Separability to be scheduled for Thursday 14 or
Tuesday 19 May.

4. Brief update client committee

On ongoing forward basis in full of time and resources, especially at end of public comment period.

Outstanding deliverables: provide update Thursday 

(1) stress tests for insider vs. outsider board; 

(2) memo on public benefit vs. LLC; and 

(3) term sheet on the ICANN/PTI contract/SOW

Need to understand scope of work and implied cost, in context of resources used by CWG

5. AOB

    a. CWG to send outreach to Bart for Section VI

What have groups done as part of outreach to their own community.

ACTION member groups: provide brief overview

OFAC licencing is checked, Statement in proposal drafted by ICANN legal.

Sidley is doing term sheets

6. Closing Remarks

Next call 14 May 2015

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150512/66069a64/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150512/66069a64/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150512/66069a64/smime-0001.p7s>