[Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from today'smeeting

[Manal Ismail]

Thanks Marika ..

It's good that you've noticed and elaborated on the survey bullet to
avoid any misinterpretation; as it was unanimously agreed not to share
the results of the survey at this stage ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal 

 

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:55 AM
To: Manal Ismail; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from
today'smeeting

 

Thanks, Manal, I've updated this in the notes that have been posted on
the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/2bjhAg
<https://community.icann.org/x/2bjhAg> ). In doing so, I also realised
that there was something missing from one of the other bullet points
regarding the survey and have updated as follows: Share results received
so far with the GAC mailing list (not full survey results, but number of
participants and relatively limited input provided to date to inspire
additional responses). 

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

From: Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
Date: Wednesday 16 July 2014 02:18
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, "gac-gnso-cg at icann.org"
<gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from
today'smeeting

 

Many thanks Marika ..

Can you please add 'leadership regular interaction' to the second bullet
of the Day-to-day mechanism, to read:

*	Also consider joint meetings/leadership regular interaction and
possible ideas for improvement 

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:06 PM
To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from
today'smeeting

 

Dear All,

 

Please find below the notes / action items from today's meeting. 

 

In order to determine expected participation during the next calls
scheduled in July and August, please complete the following doodle poll:
http://doodle.com/e7tms8g47xd6gzcm.

 

Thanks,

 

Marika

 

Action items / notes 15/7 meeting:

 

*	Remind members of call schedule and need to participate in
meetings

GNSO Liaison to the GAC

*	Agree timetable for appointment - also taking into account
travel planning for LA meeting
*	Update to be provided to GAC during their meeting on 31 July / 1
August on status of appointment

Liaison support

*	Will follow appointment of liaison
*	Will need to managed properly to ensure that expectations are
met
*	Possible setting up mailing list following appointment of GNSO
liaison to the GAC to allow for conversation - further consider what
other or additional mechanisms may be needed
*	Serve as a resource to GNSO liaison to the GAC
*	GAC focus expected to be on those items that affect or
potentially affect public policy

GAC members survey

*	Consider extending deadline to the beginning of next month,
incentivise participation and send another reminder
*	Consider other mechanisms to obtain input
*	Liaison could also provide regular updates or flag certain
issues that may be of interest
*	Share results received so far with the GAC mailing list

Work plan between now and LA

*	Consider maintaining same frequency for meetings (every two
weeks), with team leads meetings in the weeks in between. Does there
need to be a pauze for vacation time?
*	No team lead calls for now, but use mailing list and schedule
ad-hoc calls as needed
*	Staff to conduct a doodle poll for meetings throughout July and
August to determine availability of CG members

Day-to-day mechanism

*	Go ahead with current pilots (GNSO liaison and group of
liaisons) and determine effect of those before moving forward with other
items.
*	Also consider joint meetings and possible ideas for improvement

PDP Work Track

*	Amr to connect with Suzanne
*	GAC to look into some of the ideas that were suggested in London
such as triage committee
*	Review slides from London meeting

AOB

*	Is CG the right mechanism to look into hot topics? - probaby
not, this group is focused on process not substance
*	Issues may guide conversations as use cases

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140716/64824ee3/attachment-0001.html>