[Gac-gnso-cg] Notes from today's meeting

[Manal Ismail]

Many thanks Marika ..

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 5:09 PM
To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Notes from today's meeting

 

Dear All,

 

Please find below the notes from today's GAC-GNSO Consultation Group
meeting. If I've missed anything, please feel free to add.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

Notes 23/9:

 

Welcome to GNSO Liaison to the GAC

*	Confirm GAC agenda when available to Mason, including which
meetings are closed
*	Consider when / how introductions should be made during the
ICANN meeting

Day-to-day work / PDP Track

*	Document (day-to-day work track) is not intended to be presented
/ shared in LA - to be used to capture brainstorming / ideas and derive
from there suggestions to be shared in LA
*	What triggers are there on the GNSO side that would 'require'
involvement of the GAC, for example previous GAC advice, link of issue
to national laws?
*	Joint committee of some form could facilitate such two-way
conversation as well as identifying when public policy issues are
involved (what role can the GNSO play in this, what role does the GAC
have). Need to discuss how this could be done in a pilot format.
Possible permanent changes could/would need to be reflected in the GNSO
Operating Procedures. Further conversations in both the GAC and GNSO may
be helpful to obtain input. 
*	Need to prepare well for the discussion in LA as not everyone
may have followed this conversation as closely
*	Consider sharing examples of current briefing documents and
papers with GAC to obtain more concrete input on how these can be
improved / modified.
*	Consider putting forward ideas / suggestions for consideration
and obtain input from both communities which may provide further
guidance on how to work out some of those ideas in further detail
*	Proposal to slow things further down may not be well received -
mapping out processes in tandem (GNSO and GAC) may give a better
indication if/how/when additional time may be needed
*	Early stages of PDP are fairly slow - maybe question is to
refocus GAC attention on those phases instead of when recommendations
are already fairly baked.
*	Ability for GAC to identify experts on certain issues could
greatly facilitate work on topics that are considered to have an impact
on public policy

Other

*	Next meeting scheduled for 7 October
*	Discuss materials for LA meeting on mailing list
*	Work on agenda for F2F meeting for LA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140923/23601f65/attachment.html>