[Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Follow-up regarding the transition discussions in Dublin

[gtheo]

Agreed.

Theo

Roger D Carney schreef op 2015-11-25 03:11 AM:
> Thanks for the follow-up Fabien.
> 
> As to your second item. In light of the recent movements in the
> privacy landscape and the many discussions over the past few months I
> think it would be prudent for the IRT to discuss the issues further
> with the goal to provide the needed information for the IRT to move
> forward in an educated and informed direction.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Roger
> 
> FROM: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org] ON BEHALF OF Fabien
> Betremieux
> SENT: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:15 PM
> TO: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org
> SUBJECT: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Follow-up regarding the transition
> discussions in Dublin
> 
> Dear IRT Members,
> 
> Following our meeting in Dublin, there were two items ICANN wanted to
> follow up on related to the transition from thin to thick Whois.
> 
> 1) Legal Review Memo: in response to Marc Anderson's question
> regarding the status of the legal review memo required by policy
> recommendation 3, we would like to confirm that the memo published on
> 8 June 2015, discussed during the subsequent IRT meetings on 24 June
> (ICANN 53) and 4 August 2015, fulfills the portion of recommendation
> #3 which requires that "_As part of the implementation process a legal
> review of law applicable to the transition of data from a thin to
> thick model that has not already been considered in the EWG memo is
> undertaken and due consideration is given to potential privacy issues
> that may arise from the discussions on the transition from thin to
> thick Whois, including, for example, guidance on how the long-standing
> contractual requirement that registrars give notice to, and obtain
> consent, from each registrant for uses of any personally identifiable
> data submitted by the registrant should apply to registrations
> involved in the transition._"
> 
> 2) Transition from Thin to Thick: Joe Waldron questioned whether the
> recent data privacy law developments in Russia and the EU would
> warrant referring the matter back to the GNSO given that their impact
> may go beyond the scope of the policy recommendations, and considering
> policy recommendation 3 which states "_Should any privacy issues
> emerge from these transition discussions that were not anticipated by
> the WG and which would require additional policy consideration, the
> Implementation Review Team is expected to notify the GNSO Council of
> these so that appropriate action can be taken_". This is an
> interesting question, and it seems the IRT may want to discuss this
> notion. If that is the case, please let ICANN know and we can schedule
> a call for that discussion or you can have it on the mailing list.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> --
> 
> On behalf of the Implementation Project Team
> 
> Fabien Betremieux
> 
> Sr. Registry Services & Engagement Manager
> 
> Global Domains Division, ICANN
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt