[Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Thick Whois Transition Policy draft v4

[theo geurts]

Hi Dennis,
Maybe we are going the wrong way here and we mixing things.

We discussed the alternative because it came up during a discussion 
within the RrSG. And I think Jennifer Gore mentioned this on the list.
Now I think, but Chris Pelling can most likely bring some clarity here 
on why he proposed to use the RDE data for the migration, and I think 
but I am not sure, his reasoning was to speed things up. But I will let 
Chris weigh in on that one.

But if that is the case and combine the fact that we also said not to 
use the RDE deposit approach as an alternative bulk method then we might 
want to backtrack on this alternative approach altogether.

I cannot come up with a good argument that justifies an alternative bulk 
method while the Registrar in question has to make the EPP modifications 
anyways (May 2018). But perhaps Jennifer can weigh in on this? I have a 
feeling that we are mixing a few conversations and emails into 
requirements for no good reason.

Theo


On 27-9-2016 17:12, Dennis Chang wrote:
>
> Theo,
>
> I’ll be sure to add to the agenda.
>
> For Section 2.2, if you could provide suggested language before the 
> meeting, I can have it for the IRT to review as well.
>
> Thanks
>
> Dennis Chang
>
> *From: *"Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson at verisign.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:07 AM
> *To: *Dennis Chang <dennis.chang at icann.org>, 
> "gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org" <gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org>
> *Subject: *RE: Thick Whois Transition Policy draft v4
>
> Dennis,
>
> Thank you for sending out this updated version.  In preparation for 
> our upcoming call I have a couple items.
>
> ·Section 2.2 pertains to Registries providing an (alternative) bulk 
> method for the backfill of contact data.  I’d like to propose an 
> update to the language in this section.  Could I have some time during 
> the meeting to present?
>
> ·At the last meeting I brought up the billing contact and agreed to 
> propose clarifying language.  I suggest adding a section 2.11 that states:
>
> /The “Billing” contact is optional.  Registry Policy may define if it 
> is required, optional or not supported.  If supported the Billing 
> contact information must be displayed as described in the “Advisory: 
> Clarifications to the Registry Agreement, and the 2013 Registrar 
> Accreditation Agreement (RAA) regarding applicable Registration Data 
> Directory Service (Whois) Specifications” (section 22)./
>
> I’d also like to get the IRT’s thoughts on the Billing contact in 
> general.  My sense is that no one is really concerned if the billing 
> contact is present or not and that in order to facilitate the 
> transition from thin to thick it would be easiest to not include it.
>
> ·Finally, can we add an agenda item to talk about Escrow of contact 
> data?  It was a topic considered during the PDP deliberations but we 
> haven’t touched on it as part of the IRT deliberations.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Marc Anderson
>
> *From:*gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org> 
> [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Dennis Chang
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:22 PM
> *To:* gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Thick Whois Transition Policy 
> draft v4
>
> Dear Thick Whois IRT,
>
> Attached are the Transition Policy drafts from our review this week.  
> A clean and redlined provided for your further review.
>
> Three key updates are
>
> 1)Adapted the alternate definition of Thick
>
> 2)Incorporated the requirements to the body of policy per sections 
> rather than the definition
>
> 3)Removed sections referring to RDAP
>
> Please provide your comments prior to the meeting if possible so that 
> we may continue to discuss on line and prepare better for the team 
> meeting next week.
>
> Agenda for the next meeting will be provided to you in a separate 
> email which you may also comment on.
>
> —
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Dennis S. Chang
>
> GDD Services & Engagement Program Director
>
> +1 213 293 7889
>
> Skype: dennisSchang
>
> www.icann.org[icann.org] 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DQMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=_f3H3Pcml_qJDJloAyJpIVETJx00tS7PzbGeSwpiK_4&s=-jPEE6wRYHqfFNrPmqa8xGUQ6q7I9vMvdXKFVyFX_BE&e=>   
> "One World, One Internet"
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt/attachments/20160927/f4f429eb/attachment.html>