[Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Thick Whois Transition Policy draft v4

Tue Sep 27 17:20:19 UTC 2016

I was wondering why Dennis was putting things for me on the agenda and 
asking me to suggest language :)

Anyways, perhaps Marc and the rest of the IRT can agree with what I just 
sent and either discuss it or wait till folks I mentioned weigh in 
before we go discuss 2.2?

Theo

On 27-9-2016 19:13, theo geurts wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
> Maybe we are going the wrong way here and we mixing things.
>
> We discussed the alternative because it came up during a discussion 
> within the RrSG. And I think Jennifer Gore mentioned this on the list.
> Now I think, but Chris Pelling can most likely bring some clarity here 
> on why he proposed to use the RDE data for the migration, and I think 
> but I am not sure, his reasoning was to speed things up. But I will 
> let Chris weigh in on that one.
>
> But if that is the case and combine the fact that we also said not to 
> use the RDE deposit approach as an alternative bulk method then we 
> might want to backtrack on this alternative approach altogether.
>
> I cannot come up with a good argument that justifies an alternative 
> bulk method while the Registrar in question has to make the EPP 
> modifications anyways (May 2018). But perhaps Jennifer can weigh in on 
> this? I have a feeling that we are mixing a few conversations and 
> emails into requirements for no good reason.
>
> Theo
>
>
> On 27-9-2016 17:12, Dennis Chang wrote:
>>
>> Theo,
>>
>> I’ll be sure to add to the agenda.
>>
>> For Section 2.2, if you could provide suggested language before the 
>> meeting, I can have it for the IRT to review as well.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Dennis Chang
>>
>> *From: *"Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson at verisign.com>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:07 AM
>> *To: *Dennis Chang <dennis.chang at icann.org>, 
>> "gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org" <gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *RE: Thick Whois Transition Policy draft v4
>>
>> Dennis,
>>
>> Thank you for sending out this updated version.  In preparation for 
>> our upcoming call I have a couple items.
>>
>> ·Section 2.2 pertains to Registries providing an (alternative) bulk 
>> method for the backfill of contact data.  I’d like to propose an 
>> update to the language in this section.  Could I have some time 
>> during the meeting to present?
>>
>> ·At the last meeting I brought up the billing contact and agreed to 
>> propose clarifying language.  I suggest adding a section 2.11 that 
>> states:
>>
>> /The “Billing” contact is optional.  Registry Policy may define if it 
>> is required, optional or not supported.  If supported the Billing 
>> contact information must be displayed as described in the “Advisory: 
>> Clarifications to the Registry Agreement, and the 2013 Registrar 
>> Accreditation Agreement (RAA) regarding applicable Registration Data 
>> Directory Service (Whois) Specifications” (section 22)./
>>
>> I’d also like to get the IRT’s thoughts on the Billing contact in 
>> general. My sense is that no one is really concerned if the billing 
>> contact is present or not and that in order to facilitate the 
>> transition from thin to thick it would be easiest to not include it.
>>
>> ·Finally, can we add an agenda item to talk about Escrow of contact 
>> data?  It was a topic considered during the PDP deliberations but we 
>> haven’t touched on it as part of the IRT deliberations.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Marc Anderson
>>
>> *From:*gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org 
>> <mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org> 
>> [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of 
>> *Dennis Chang
>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:22 PM
>> *To:* gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org 
>> <mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org>
>> *Subject:* [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Thick Whois Transition Policy 
>> draft v4
>>
>> Dear Thick Whois IRT,
>>
>> Attached are the Transition Policy drafts from our review this week.  
>> A clean and redlined provided for your further review.
>>
>> Three key updates are
>>
>> 1)Adapted the alternate definition of Thick
>>
>> 2)Incorporated the requirements to the body of policy per sections 
>> rather than the definition
>>
>> 3)Removed sections referring to RDAP
>>
>> Please provide your comments prior to the meeting if possible so that 
>> we may continue to discuss on line and prepare better for the team 
>> meeting next week.
>>
>> Agenda for the next meeting will be provided to you in a separate 
>> email which you may also comment on.
>>
>> —
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Dennis S. Chang
>>
>> GDD Services & Engagement Program Director
>>
>> +1 213 293 7889
>>
>> Skype: dennisSchang
>>
>> www.icann.org[icann.org] 
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DQMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=_f3H3Pcml_qJDJloAyJpIVETJx00tS7PzbGeSwpiK_4&s=-jPEE6wRYHqfFNrPmqa8xGUQ6q7I9vMvdXKFVyFX_BE&e=>   
>> "One World, One Internet"
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
>> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt/attachments/20160927/fcc9198f/attachment-0001.html>