[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3] Sub-Pro WT3 Position on Limited Public Interest Objections

[Paul McGrady]

Hi Kiran,

Thanks for the clarification and context.  If this is limited only the
"limited public interest objections" than I guess I am not as concerned.
Apologies for being unduly alarmed!

Best,
Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: Kiran Malancharuvil [mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 10:57 AM
To: Paul McGrady <policy at paulmcgrady.com>
Cc: Karen Day <Karen.Day at sas.com>; gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3] Sub-Pro WT3 Position on Limited Public
Interest Objections

Hi Paul,

It seems like the very narrow scope of this email is "cnot the AGB as a
whole, and Karen's email should be taken as referring to such.

Perhaps I'm wrong but your email seems slightly alarmist if that's the case.

Thanks,

Kiran

Kiran Malancharuvil
Policy Counselor
MarkMonitor
415-419-9138 (m)

Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.

On Oct 27, 2016, at 8:55 AM, Paul McGrady
<policy at paulmcgrady.com<mailto:policy at paulmcgrady.com>> wrote:

Karen,

This is what I was worried about.  When you say the AGB remains "in good
order, functioned as envisioned and within scope, and are sufficient for
subsequent procedures" it gives the incorrect impression that we have gone
through the Guidebook and all of it is "remain in good order, functioned as
envisioned and within scope, and are sufficient for subsequent procedures."
This is not even vaguely the case.  As we discussed on a call, there was
agreement that the current format of the AGB seems suited to its purpose,
but we reached no conclusions on all of the content.  I think  this
distinction is vital and I hope that the distinction appears in any summary
of our work to date.  Thanks!

Best,
Paul



From:
gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3-bounces at ica
nn.org> [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Karen
Day
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 9:09 AM
To: 'gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org>'
<gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org>>
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3] Sub-Pro WT3 Position on Limited Public
Interest Objections
Importance: High

Dear WT3 members:

Based on our discussions and feedback thus far, I'd like to seek
confirmation of my understanding that, we are approaching consensus that the
existing policy and AGB (see attached for the specific language) remain in
good order, functioned as envisioned and within scope, and are sufficient
for subsequent procedures.

I do note that we do have concerns about the high cost of these objections,
whether or not the Panel implemented the "quick look" procedure
appropriately, and the role of the Independent Objector.  These items will
be specifically covered later in our work flow and the outcomes applied
accordingly.

Please let us know whether you are in agreement, you disagree (stating why)
or whether you would prefer to reserve judgement until further work is done
(stating what work you'd like to see).  Silence will be taken as agreement.
:)

Thanks for your participation and I wish safe travels to those of you going
to Hyderabad.

Best regards,
Karen
____________________________
Karen L. Day, NCCP ACP
Registry Operations Manager
Tel: + 1 919-531-6016 ? Mobile: + 1 919-599-4356 ?
karen.day at sas.com<mailto:karen.day at sas.com>
SAS Institute Inc.? SAS Campus Drive ? Cary, NC 27513 USA


_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3