[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] For review: Work Track 5 report to the full Working Group - deadline for comments Friday 11 October

[Marita Moll]

I wonder if those who were seeking some changes and don't see any in 
this report actually agree with this statement in section D.

"After extensive discussion the Work Track arrived at the conclusion 
that 2012 implementation is an *outcome that is more acceptable to the 
group as a whole than the alternatives* considered."

The fact that no agreement for change was reached doesn't make it 
acceptable.

Marita


On 10/1/2019 6:32 PM, Alexander Schubert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Page 18 “if if” in the 2^nd sentence.
>
> In summary I must say the “report” could be shortened to:
>
> */“Due to partisan divisions in the working group we have not changed 
> the protection of geo-communities AT ALL – but have kept the 2012 
> provisions in its entirety”./*
>
> I mean: I do not see ANY “change” at all. So many years of hard work – 
> and no evolution of geo community protection AT ALL. Very frustrating.
>
> I have suggested on several occasions that we impose a shelf-life for 
> the signature on the letter of non-objection (e.g. max 3 month prior 
> to application submission); e.g. to avoid a second “.africa” disaster. 
> What about that suggestion?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander
>
> *From:*Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 
> [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Emily 
> Barabas
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 01, 2019 5:54 PM
> *To:* gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] For review: Work Track 5 report to 
> the full Working Group - deadline for comments Friday 11 October
>
> Sent on behalf of the Work Track 5 Co-Leaders
>
> Dear Work Track 5 members,
>
> Please find attached a draft of the Work Track 5 report to the full 
> Working Group for your review. As discussed on our last call, this 
> report is much shorter than the Initial Report and focuses on Work 
> Track 5’s recommendations to the full Working Group. Please note that 
> this report only summarizes deliberations that have taken place since 
> the publication of the Initial Report and does not repeat points, 
> issues, and positions covered in the Initial Report.
>
> If you have comments on this draft, please *provide feedback to the 
> Work Track 5 mailing list no later than Friday 11 October*. Please 
> focus your comments on anything that is incorrect, missing, or that 
> you otherwise feel that you are completely unable to accept. Minor 
> editorial suggestions, such as typo corrections, can be sent directly 
> to staff.
>
> A call will be scheduled on Wednesday 16 October to discuss any 
> feedback the leadership team receives that cannot be easily resolved 
> with proposed edits.
>
> Please note that there a few non-substantive edits in part (D) that 
> have been added since the last version of this section was circulated. 
> The edits are intended to improve clarity of the text and are shared 
> in redline, so that all members have a chance to review.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> WT5 Co-Leaders
> Olga Cavalli, Annebeth Lange, Javier Rúa-Jovet, Martin Sutton
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191007/48857911/attachment.html>