[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Use cases

[Stephanie Perrin]

Thanks Marika!  If it really did eliminate it, then I can relax.  I am 
just wondering.....

SP


On 2016-08-15 17:23, Marika Konings wrote:
>
> Hi Stephanie,
>
> A GNSO consensus policy was implemented a couple of years back which 
> according to data collected nearly eliminated the issue of domain 
> tasting (see https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2009-08-12-en) 
> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2009-08-12-en%29>. Not sure 
> whether that changes your view on whether a use case is still needed, 
> but I thought I would share regardless.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> *Marika Konings*
>
> Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet 
> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Email: marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>
>
> //
>
> /Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO/
>
> /Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses 
> <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer 
> pages 
> <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>./
>
> *From: *<gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie 
> Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> *Date: *Monday 15 August 2016 at 14:36
> *To: *"gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Use cases
>
> I think we need a use case on domain tasting.  I am certainly not the 
> person to write it, as I barely understand how it works, but I do 
> think we need one, given the extent of the practice (in my limited 
> understanding).
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160815/5bf50f60/attachment.html>