[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

Metalitz, Steven met at msk.com
Tue Aug 23 15:39:22 UTC 2016


Sara's redline is more constrained but does it omit our main job, which is to resolve/manage/accommodate/mitigate the divergent and sometimes contradictory interests in RDS which the earlier draft rather succinctly identified?   (I realize all those verbs are different, and not sure which is the best.)

If the "core problem" is really to "account for rules, regulations and laws" then should the job be turned over to the GAC which after all represents the sources and authoritative interpreters of those "rules, regulations and laws"?   I doubt that would be a satisfactory way to proceed.

[image001]
Steven J. Metalitz | Partner, through his professional corporation
T: 202.355.7902 | met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | www.msk.com<http://www.msk.com/>
1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 9:44 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:42:17PM +0000, Sara Bockey wrote:
>
> The problem statement should be explicit and to the point, without extraneous wording or viewpoints. Accordingly, my proposed revisions are attached.
>

I think this is vastly better because it is more constrained.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg<https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160823/32f8b77c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2772 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160823/32f8b77c/image001.gif>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list