[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Starting from Scratch

[Farell Folly]

I am afraid we are going in too much detail...too EARLY for that !

Best Regards

Best Regards
--ff--

Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.
Le 5 juil. 2016 16:49, "Rob Golding" <rob.golding at astutium.com> a écrit :

>   registrar
>>>
>> Only in TLD that have a registry/registrar model. (And we are only
>> concerned about gTLD in this WG, right?)
>>
>
> Yes, as a WG we're essentially only concerned with gTLDs under ICANNs
> remit, so they all have a Registry/Registrar model (even if the Registrar
> on a brand-tld could be the Registry)
>
>   auth-code
>>>
>> Also note that this is not baked into DNS technology or anything like
>> that, but is only an artifact of a current registrar transfer system.
>> Fundamentally this is a way to authenticate the registrant, which is
>> what the registry really needs.
>>
>
> It's less about authentication of the Registrant, and more about ensuring
> authorisation has been gained for the Transfer.
>
>   status
>>>
>> What does this mean?
>>
>
> Domains are (currently) required to have "status" code(s) relating to
> locks, udrp etc - but on further reflection it's not absolutely necessary
> for the domain name to exist or function (although will be there
> "internally" at the Registry)
>
> And for it to be of some "functional" use:
>>> Optional
>>>   nameservers
>>>
>>
>> And also optionally:
>>    DS record (or DNSKEY or other cryptographic information which can be
>>    used to produce a DS record for DNSSEC).
>>
>
> Is the most-effective Denial-Of-Service methodology for domains actually
> needed for it to "work" though (leaving aside how many dont work because of
> dnssec) ? Probably.
>
> So ...
>
> To Exist =
> * domain-name (what it is)
> * registrar (who manages it)
>
> To Function [optional] =
> * nameservers
> * ds-stuff
>
> To Manage / Needed for Internal Systems =
> * transfer authentication [optional dependant on registration model]
> * expiry date
> * status
>
>
> As a final note, if there are no registrars then everything except for
>> the expiry date can be obtained from the DNS itself.
>>
>
> In principle I agree - I'm sure we can argue the minutiae of detail about
> whether it needs to be somewhere else for DNS to work though
>
> Anyone else have items to add which are _required_ rather than one-or-more
> of wants/nice-to-have/needed-for-my-business-model etc ?
>
>
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160705/6b16312c/attachment.html>