[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Contractibility, PBC and required contact methods....

nathalie coupet nathaliecoupet at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 24 18:16:03 UTC 2017


+1 re legal reasons for contactability 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 24, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Victoria Sheckler <vsheckler at riaa.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 re legal reasons for contactability
>  
> From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Winterfeldt, Brian J.
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:04 PM
> To: Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org>
> Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Contractibility, PBC and required contact methods....
>  
> Dear all:
>  
> We agree it is helpful to keep in mind the point of view that contactability is synonymous with the legal concept of service of process.  However, in the United States there is no firm rule regarding the validity of an email address for this purpose.  Contact information needs to be “reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise Defendants of the pendency of [an] action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.” See Liberty Media Holdings, LLC v. March 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5290 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2011). 
>  
> Outside of the United States, email by itself is even more unreliable since each particular country may not have acceded to the Hague Convention governing service of process, and, even if they have, exceptions might explicitly carve still out email addresses.
>  
> Thus, we believe it in the best interests of all good actors in the ecosystem to have multiple methods of contactability, including (most importantly) a street address, in addition to an email address.  We could theoretically forego contactability in this regard, if registrants are required to designate an agent for service of process, or if contracted parties would prefer the unnecessary inclusion in legal actions where no service of process can be made on the underlying registrants, or the otherwise directly responsible parties.
>  
> Thank you,
>  
> Brian, Phil and Griffin 
>  
> Brian J. Winterfeldt
> Co-Head of Global Brand Management and Internet Practice
> Mayer Brown LLP
> 
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 1:31 PM, Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org> wrote:
> 
> On 24/8/17 9:15 am, Greg Aaron wrote:
> 
> Two WG calls ago, we had extensive discussion about how legal processes require multiple methods of contactability.  And require physical addresses, not just electronic service.
> 
> I missed that call, but it's not quite accurate since a court can order substituted service by email.  Even publishing a notice in the newspaper can be used for service if the court allows it.
> 
> In any case, I agree with Volker that there should not be three mandatory contact methods.  Physical and/or email address should be enough.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Global Policy Analyst
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> https://eff.org
> jmalcolm at eff.org
>  
> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>  
> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>  
> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
> PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgnso-rds-pdp-wg&data=01%7C01%7CBWinterfeldt%40mayerbrown.com%7C79df36ae9c7b4b44951c08d4eb15d9d7%7C09131022b7854e6d8d42916975e51262%7C0&sdata=P9x6PXYFAjizRghO%2FPgR0WkIDANri%2FUi4laZ%2BgYwFTA%3D&reserved=0
> __________________________________________________________________________
> 
>  
> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170824/6a67216d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list