[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Article 29 Working Party to ICANN

[Sivasubramanian M]

Would it help if ICANN maintains a Distributed Register?  Could provide the
authentication, required information, while maintaining the required degree
of privacy.

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:21 PM, David Hofstee <opentext.dhofstee at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Five remarks:
> - The working group has not made a claim on if the grounds "Necessary for
> the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller" can
> hold or not. Abuse of domain names is real and has direct relationship with
> Ransomware and other (botnet) abuse.
> - ICANN is allowed to publish non PII data, such as "country" or "city",
> obviously. This still provides information.
> - ICANN may want to think of a *robust* way of creating a digtal
> fingerprints of the (PII properties of the) owner of the domain. Provided
> they ensure the data is of higher quality, this can work (e..g. check that
> the email addresses still works, same for phone numbers).
> - ICANN may want to register the IP address that registered the domain
> name. This would have to be anonymized before publishing. This can be done
> by removing the last X bits. This information helps in finding abuse.
> - ICANN may want to keep the option of the owner to be able to voluntary
> publish domain owner data. This can provide a method for disputes with
> other entities (e.g. reputation providers/blacklists).
>
> Yours,
>
>
> David
>
> On 7 December 2017 at 12:08, sivasubramanian muthusamy <
> 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ICANN might have to appoint a Data Controller, who will assume all
>> functional and legal responsibilities for all data in ICANN's sphere, limit
>> what data is published, and more importantly publish data only when the
>> Registrant gives explicit consent.
>>
>> Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>> twitter.com/shivaindia
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <
>> michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All
>>>
>>> I'd highly recommend that you take the time to read the latest letter
>>> from the Article 29 Working Party to ICANN:
>>>
>>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/falque-
>>> pierrotin-to-chalaby-marby-06Dec17-en.pdf
>>>
>>> (also attached)
>>>
>>> For clarity the Article 29 WP represents the views of the DPAs of the EU
>>> member states. In many instances DPAs will address their concerns via this
>>> group rather than individually.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Michele
>>> 
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mr Michele Neylon
>>> Blacknight Solutions
>>> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>>> https://www.blacknight.com/
>>> https://blacknight.blog/
>>> https://ceo.hosting/
>>> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072 <+353%2059%20918%203072>
>>> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 <+353%2059%20918%203090>
>>> -------------------------------
>>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
>>> Park,Sleaty
>>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
>>> Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> My opinion is mine.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171207/f32b8044/attachment.html>