[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] authoritative

[Sam Lanfranco]

 From Paul Keating's posting and in terms of my comments:

  * here the adjective "authoritative" would not not mean "recognized as
    true, valid"
  * here the adjective "authoritative" would mean "official, authorized"

The best that can be done here is to have  official, authorized, Data of 
Record from a Source of Record.
The struggle for data quality is an ongoing struggle, here, everywhere, 
and always.

What the Data of Record data set consists of, and build with a 
sensitivity to purpose, seems to me to be the main rds-pdp-wg task here.

As to who has access to what and under what terms, ICANN might set some 
terms there, but ultimately ICANN,
as a stakeholder there will play an advisory role. National and 
multilateral policies will rule above ICANN policy.

Sam L.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170501/192ed803/attachment-0001.html>