[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Principle on Proportionality for "Thin Data"access

[Farell Folly]

Hello Nathalie,

I almost agree with your definition  of proportionality but reticent  on
the last sentence and need to be sure we are in the same page

>>>This principle potentially avoids having to resort to 'legitimate
purposes' which cannot be verified for unauthenticated access.

I always defend the need for legitimate purpose for all requests even for
unauthenticated access  because I think if somenone wants to know who I am
he/she must  at least tell me who he is.... Or if someone wants to know I
do as business he must at least state the purpose.. This is how I see
proportionality.


Regards
@__f_f__

PhD Candidate, Universität der Bundeswehr München
Computer Security | Internet of Things
https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
________________________________.
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.


Le 30 mai 2017 19:08, "nathalie coupet via gnso-rds-pdp-wg" <
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> a écrit :

Hi Paul,

In the context of thin data, in view of the opposition of some to allow
unauthenticated access to all the thin data, the principle of
proportionality serves as an over-arching principle at this particular
phase in our work in order to protect data from abuse while not restricting
access.
Thin data must be proportionate to the query, be useful for that particular
query. All and any other thin data foreign to this query should not be
shared. This principle potentially avoids having to resort to 'legitimate
purposes' which cannot be verified for unauthenticated access.


Nathalie


On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:44 PM, "Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg" <
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:


Because Nathalie was the originator and was unable to speak on the call, I
encourage her to describe the nature of the issue on this thread.

Chuck

*From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-
bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul Keating
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:17 PM
*To:* Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com>; RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Principle on Proportionality
for "Thin Data"access

Im sorry to have missed the call but had a client engagement.

Can someone briefly describe the nature of the issue?

Thanks
Paul

*From: *<gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Lisa Phifer <
lisa at corecom.com>
*Date: *Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 7:52 PM
*To: *RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
*Subject: *[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Principle on Proportionality for "Thin
Data"access


All, per today's call action item:



*Action Item: Nathalie Coupet and any other WG members who wish to do so to
propose to the WG list a new principle on proportionality for "thin data."
All WG members to comment on that proposed principle in advance of next
call. *we are starting a new thread here which anyone may reply to if they
wish to propose (or respond to) a new principle on proportionality for
"thin data" access.

Best, Lisa
_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing
list gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/
listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg



_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170530/cbbcb370/attachment-0001.html>