[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 29 August Meeting

[Farell Folly]

Andrew... I have now understood your point....it is very tricky to catch
up.. But you are totally right !



Regards
@__f_f__
https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
________________________________
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.

Le 3 sept. 2017 16:24, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> a écrit :

> On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 02:26:26AM -0700, Farell Folly wrote:
> > @Andrew
> >
> > What if we use the second possible way of understanding *optional* :
> >
> > <<This won't be provided unless you know it >> instead of :
>
> Suppose I know it and I don't tell you?  How can you tell the
> difference between "refused to provide" and "was not available to be
> provided"?
>
> A thing that is optional for you to provide me is provided at _your_
> option, not mine.  My income tax rate is not optional, even though the
> government could set it differently.
>
> What people are arguing for here is an element that is mandatory to
> provide, if it exists.  I have no issue that there might be such
> elements.  I have a grave problem with pretending that they're
> optional to provide.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170903/8b28dcfd/attachment.html>