[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] WSGR Final Memorandum
John Bambenek
jcb at bambenekconsulting.com
Wed Sep 27 21:58:27 UTC 2017
A simple policy proscription would be, for instance, to say under US law
if you get a domain under the control of a US registrar, we need you to
consent to full disclosure. Don't like it, pick a European ccTLD. I
don't advocate that, mind you, but that's the kind of policy
balkanization could produce.
j
On 09/27/2017 04:31 PM, Paul Keating wrote:
> I am failing to understand how such a walled-garden approach will
> solve anything.
>
> 1.EU registrars/registries would still have to deal with GDPR.
>
> 2.Registrars are not aided by the distinction since they would still
> end up with EU customers and EU registrant data.
>
> PRK
>
> From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of jonathan
> matkowsky <jonathan.matkowsky at riskiq.net
> <mailto:jonathan.matkowsky at riskiq.net>>
> Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 11:03 PM
> To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br <mailto:rubensk at nic.br>>
> Cc: RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] WSGR Final Memorandum
>
> Assuming for argument's sake that's true without taking any
> position as I'm still catching up from a week ago, I'm not sure
> this should be dismissed without consideration as a possibility,
> although obviously not by any stretch of the imagination ideal -->
> non-EU registrars block EU registrants, and registries contract
> with non-EU registrars.
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br
> <mailto:rubensk at nic.br>> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 26, 2017, at 7:17 PM, John Horton
>> <john.horton at legitscript.com
>> <mailto:john.horton at legitscript.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Much of this problem goes away if we all agree that EU-based
>> registrars should henceforth only be allowed to accept
>> registrants in the EU. Aside from the effect on EU
>> registrars' revenue, what's the logical argument against that
>> from a policy perspective?
>>
>> After all, isn't the purpose of the GDPR to protect _EU
>> residents_?
>
> That's correct, but the conclusion is not. Non-EU registrars
> are also subject to GDPR if targeting EU customers, which
> could be as simple as providing services in EU languages and
> accepting registration transactions from the EU.
> So, for the problem to go away non-EU registrars would need to
> block EU registrants, and registries would only be able to
> enter contracts with non-EU registrars.
>
> So EU users would either be happy using numeric IP addresses,
> or develop a naming system of their own. Then we would have
> balkanisation, this time actually including the original balkans.
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg>
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************
> This message was sent from RiskIQ, and is intended only for the
> designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or
> proprietary information and may be subject to confidentiality
> protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not
> review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in
> error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this
> message. Thank
> you.*******************************************************************_______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170927/58167a23/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list