[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 24 January Meeting

[Dotzero]

Here's a question Andrew... How does this differ from ICANN requiring a
statement of interest, the use of participant names in polls and that these
items containing personal information (PI) be disclosed publicly? If the
interest in transparency here outweighs privacy interests a la GDPR, how
does it differ? Participants are not given a choice. Just a little thought
exercise.

Michael Hammer

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 7:34 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 05:07:22PM -0500, nathalie coupet via
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg wr> They are legitimate purpose, but it doesn’t necessarily
> mean that personal data should be processed, just because they are
> legitimate uses for third parties.
>
> As near as I can tell, the above argument turns on a meaning of
> "processed" different to the one actually in the poll.
>
> We will never get anywhere if participants persist in opening
> discussions based on alternative definitions to those already
> specified.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180127/f9f58090/attachment.html>