[Gnso-rpm-providers] Time Zone Rotation - 23:00 UTC?

[Michael Karanicolas]

I have no objection to including UTC 2300 within the rotation of times.
Only fair for our APAC colleagues.

Best,

Michael

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> Staff would like to ask your input on potential time zone rotation for the
> Providers Sub Team calls.
>
>
>
> Among the 11 people <https://community.icann.org/x/3BW8B> in the Sub Team
> (nine members + one observer + one WG Co-Chair), three people are located
> in the APAC time zone, two in Europe, and six in North/South America. The
> 18:00 UTC time is especially inconvenient for those in the APAC time zone.
>
>
>
> Would it be helpful that we hold the meeting at *23:00 UTC* periodically?
> This would be 7am in Singapore/HK/ Kuala Lumpur, and 11pm in the UK. It
> is still not ideal, but it would be better than 18:00 UTC when APAC
> colleagues most likely could not attend.
>
>
>
> Of course, the frequency of the rotation depends on the number of future
> Sub Team meetings that we foresee. Perhaps we will gain more clarity after
> next week’s call.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, please let the group know whether holding meeting at
> 23:00 UTC would be feasible, and if so, whether we can do that for next
> week’s call. If not, do you have suggestions on alternative time?
>
>
>
> Thank you for your consideration!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ariel
>
>
>
> *Ariel Xinyue Liang*
>
> Policy Analyst | Washington, DC
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-providers mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-providers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180222/c9bffffb/attachment.html>