[Gnso-rpm-tmch] Revised Questions Listing

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi Kurt and All,  Tx you for our discussion last Friday and I look 
forward to continuing this Friday. I also had a chance to give the docs 
a close look and I've added some comments to the Charter Questions 
document. I've also reviewed the SubTeam's List of Questions - working 
off the redline to try to preserve the concerns raised in some of the 
deleted questions.

I have to tell you that I comfortable with the Provider questions - 
which I think should go out immediately, and generally with the Registry 
questions (as edited).

But the Registrar questions trouble me. We are asking for a huge amount 
of data and they are potentially very, very timeconsuming. Given that 
the TMCH Subgroup does not have any Registrar representatives (am I 
missing someone?), i strongly recommend that this set of questions. in 
draft, go back to the full WG for review with our Registrar members. I 
would like to hear their thoughts on how we might phrase these questions 
in a  fair and balanced way - to encourage the best and fullest responses.

Both files attached in Redline.

Best, Kathy


On 9/15/2016 9:17 PM, kurt at kjpritz.com wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
> Attached are several forms of the questions for registry operators, 
> registrars, et.al. that has been augmented with the questions 
> developed by Susan and Kristine after their review of the charter.
> This might be overkill, but I am sending the question list in three 
> forms:
>
>   * redlines to the last version of the question list that show:
>       o new questions from the charter review,
>       o a few question that were deleted where the group voiced concern,
>       o a few grammatical edits
>       o new comments
>   * a version with those redlines accepted but comments remaining
>   * a clean version.
>
> During the meeting, I recommend we can use the version with redlines 
> accepted but with comments as they can form the basis of our discussion.
> I also included a stand-alone list of the questions that were 
> developed from the review of the charter so that you can see the 
> sources of the new questions.
> I hope you find this helpful.
> Thank you Susan and Kristine.
> Regards,
> Kurt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160922/6139e6ef/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TMCH Data Gather- Charter Questions - Q Comments through 9-22-2016 (00970000xB3D1E).DOCX
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 34910 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160922/6139e6ef/TMCHDataGather-CharterQuestions-QCommentsthrough9-22-201600970000xB3D1E-0001.DOCX>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TMCH Sub Team list of questions - updated 15 Sept(redline)(and updated 9-22-2016) (00970025xB3D1E).DOCX
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 49787 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160922/6139e6ef/TMCHSubTeamlistofquestions-updated15Septredlineandupdated9-22-201600970025xB3D1E-0001.DOCX>