[gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH

[George Kirikos]

This issue was brought up last year:

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-June/000292.html

"Call are more productive when we have ample time to prepare for and
ponder the agenda."

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-June/000293.html

"....and we are working on ways to distribute it earlier in the future."

Organizationally and from a time management point of view, it might
make sense for the co-chairs and ICANN staff to "linger" at the
conclusion of the weekly calls for say an additional 10 minutes, after
everyone else has left, to plot the agenda for the following week's
call, while everything's fresh in their minds and everyone involved in
setting the agenda is likely present Then, WG members would likely
receive the agenda 5 to 7 days in advance of the next meeting.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/


On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Paul McGrady <policy at paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
> +1 Susan.
>
>
>
> All, we need the agenda well in advance of the calls in order to prepare for
> meaningful participation.  Do we have a time certain every week when we
> should expect them?  I would think we need 48 hours minimum…
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org]
> On Behalf Of Susan Payne
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 4:46 PM
> To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised
> Report on the TMCH
>
>
>
> Thanks for this Mary.  Could you circulate the agenda for this week,
> assuming the discussion with AG is not the whole call.
>
>
>
> Susan
>
>
>
>
>
> Susan Payne
>
> Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd
>
> 28-30 Little Russell Street
>
> London, WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom
>
>
>
> E: susan.payne at valideus.com
>
> D: +44 20 7421 8255
>
> T: +44 20 7421 8299
>
> M: +44 7971 661175
>
>
>
>
>
> From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org]
> On Behalf Of Mary Wong
> Sent: 03 April 2017 17:22
> To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report
> on the TMCH
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> We are pleased to let you know that Greg Rafert of the Analysis Group will
> be joining our Working Group for part of our call this coming Wednesday (5
> April, 1700 UTC). This note is therefore being sent to request that members
> review the Analysis Group’s Revised Report on the TMCH in time for our
> Wednesday session. We’d previously circulated the revised report; however,
> for your convenient reference here is the link to the clean version:
> https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-22feb17-en.pdf,
> as well as the redlined version (showing changes from the Draft Report that
> had been published for public comment, and that had been reviewed by our
> Working Group’s Data Gathering Sub Team):
> https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-redline-22feb17-en.pdf.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, if you have questions or comments based on your review of
> the report, please feel free to post them to this list and staff can forward
> them to Greg.
>
>
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Mary
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg