[gnso-rpm-wg] 99%+ reduction in sunrise utilization rate per TLD supports EFF call for elimination of sunrise
claudio di gangi
ipcdigangi at gmail.com
Fri Aug 11 03:56:00 UTC 2017
Thanks for your response.
Just to clarify, the question is: how many Sunrise registrations are needed
to justify having the mechanism in place? (See the subject line of this
This question was presented in light of the proposition that we are seeing
an insufficient number of Sunrise registrations per TLD. So if you think
the answer is zero then we've met the threshold.
Or are you answering a different question? On that basis, may I inquire
which question you are answering?
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:24 PM Paul Keating <paul at law.es> wrote:
> Ill bite here.
> Answer: 0 (zero). Sunrise is not fit for its original purpose. Few
> legitimate trademarks are being submitted. There is evidence of abuse in
> sunrise registrations. More importantly, the notice process seems more
> than sufficient to address the legitimate concerns.
> Sent from my iPad
> On 10 Aug 2017, at 19:25, claudio di gangi <ipcdigangi at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm going to use an extreme example to illustrate my point.
> If 1,000,000 new gTLDs are launched in the next round, how many Sunrise
> registrations do think there should be order to reach the "success"
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:50 PM George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:44 PM, George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
>> >with stats propped up with high counts of sub-$1
>> > registrations, or even domains that are stuffed into the accounts of
>> > registrants of other TLDs (e.g. .xxx with NSI, or .kiwi).
>> Sorry, that was a typo. It should have been .XYZ with NSI, of course,
>> not .XXX, e.g.
>> George Kirikos
>> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg