[gnso-rpm-wg] Updated data request form and motion for GNSO Council vote; action items from Working Group call of 6 September

[Greg Shatan]

Mary and all,

It looks like there's a mistake here.  The copy of the Metrics Request Form
attached to this email includes a number of marginal comments.  Was this
submitted to the GNSO Council this way?  If so, a clean copy should sent to
Heather so that it can be substituted for this marked-up version ASAP.
This is particularly important since the Motion states that Council is
voting on the final text.

Also, I'm unclear why "Staff will also be adding back, at co-chair Kathy
Kleiman’s request, the following text that was in the original suggestion
on gaming (which has now been moved, per Working Group agreement, to be
part of the general research tasks listed as #7 from its previous
standalone entry): “… including those describing the registration of the
word “the” and single letter marks, and any investigation/reporting of
issues/concerns/problems with TM Claims notices and abandonment.""

According to the marginal comments in the draft Metrics Request Form the
text above is being tacked on to "additional text added as per agreement
during the 6 September WG call. This is meant to replace the alternative
text suggested by Kathy: "SUBTEAM SUGGESTION: Find articles that discuss
“gaming” of the Sunrise Period, including those describing the registration
of the word “the” and single letter marks, and any investigation/reporting
of issues/concerns/problems with TM Claims notices and abandonment."

Looking only at the language quoted above, it appears that a WG agreement
on language is being overridden by a single co-Chair.  I'm sure that this
would not be allowed to happen, so I must be missing something.  I would
appreciate some clarification.

Thank you.

Greg



On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> The co-chairs have asked that staff circulate to you the motion and draft
> data request that has been submitted to the GNSO Council by our Council
> liaison Heather Forrest. The relevant documents are attached to this email.
>
>
>
> Please note that the co-chairs will be working with staff to prepare an
> Executive Summary of the request that can be used as a reference by the
> Council. Staff will also be adding back, at co-chair Kathy Kleiman’s
> request, the following text that was in the original suggestion on gaming
> (which has now been moved, per Working Group agreement, to be part of the
> general research tasks listed as #7 from its previous standalone entry): “…
> including those describing the registration of the word “the” and single
> letter marks, and any investigation/reporting of issues/concerns/problems
> with TM Claims notices and abandonment."
>
>
>
> Finally, the recording and transcript of the co-chairs’ call with the
> leadership teams of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures and the GNSO Council
> have been posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/NSQhB
>
>
>
> For your reference, here are the action items from our last call, all of
> which have been completed:
>
>    1. Co-Chairs and staff to update and finalize data request to the GNSO
>    Council
>    2. Staff to circulate links to the recording and transcripts of the
>    joint call between the leadership teams of the RPMs Review PDP Working
>    Group, the new gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Working Group and the GNSO
>    Council
>    3. Staff to remove the prioritization columns from the Google Doc when
>    it is submitted as part of the data request
>    4. Staff to move the question about translating the Trademark Claims
>    Notice from the survey of registrants and potential registrants to the
>    survey of registrars
>    5. Staff to add Sunrise gaming to the task of gathering third-party
>    sources and delete it as a standalone task
>    6. Staff to replace the words “scope and cost” with “feasibility” in
>    the task regarding development of a system to handle non-exact matches
>    7. Staff to correct reference under anonymized data from Deloitte from
>    Sunrise to TMCH registration, and clarify that the data should include both
>    undisputed domains as well as domains in dispute
>    8. Staff to clarify that data collection suggestions on URS also
>    include UDRP disputes
>
>
>
> The meeting notes will be uploaded to the Working Group wiki page for this
> meeting shortly.
>
>
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Mary
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170910/8befde89/attachment.html>