[GNSO-RPM-WG] George Kirikos Section 3.7 appeal in RPM PDP working group

Julie Hedlund julie.hedlund at icann.org
Tue Feb 5 23:58:02 UTC 2019


Dear George and RPM PDP Working Group members,

 

Please see the attached response from the RPM PDP Working Group Co-Chairs.

 

Best regards,

Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie

 

From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 11:16 PM
To: George Kirikos <icann at leap.com>
Cc: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>, Pam Little <pam.little at alibaba-inc.com>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, "kdrazek at verisign.com" <kdrazek at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] George Kirikos Section 3.7 appeal in RPM PDP working group

 

Some procedure thoughts and quick notes on the fly: 

- This appeal doesn't suspended the regular work of the wg, it continues in parallel. 

- Before going to the Chairs of the Council it has to go through the WG chairs. One just cannot skip the process unilaterally considering it pre done. I might even ask myself if this has to go to the chartering group chairs or their liason, since is only sharing information and the appeal process talks about a designated representative. That would be Paul McGrady if the WG chairs don't solve the concern. And that's it, in any case.

- The appeal process only constitutes the right to be heard, but nothing has to be done unless the authority, chairs or chartering chairs, decided to do so according to their own rules. After that, the member appealing has reached it's end with the matter, regardless of their satisfaction with the result.

 

Best,

Martin

 

 

 

 

On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 22:33 George Kirikos <icann at leap.com wrote:

Typo, I of course meant to write "NOT to obstruct our work".

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/ [leap.com]

On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:30 PM George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> As previously discussed, attached is the Section 3.7 appeal brought
> under the working group guidelines. As mentioned on the sub teams
> list, this is meant to be constructive, to to obstruct our work, but
> to call to the attention of "the powers that be" the realities on the
> ground that they appear to not be aware of or are ignoring.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> 416-588-0269
> http://www.leap.com/ [leap.com]
_______________________________________________
GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190205/166c628b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RPM PDP WG Co-Chairs Response to G Kirikos Section 3point7 Appeal-020519.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 222929 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190205/166c628b/RPMPDPWGCo-ChairsResponsetoGKirikosSection3point7Appeal-020519-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2057 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190205/166c628b/smime-0001.p7s>


More information about the GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list