[Gnso-ssc] For your review - RDS RT evaluation survey options

[Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands]

Hello All,


In regards to the time we have, i would favor option 1.

it is straight forwards, and then when we collect / cross the data, we 
could go into details for the candidates who don't meet consensus. For 
those with consensu, there is a gain of time.


Best regards


Frederic



Le 31/03/2017 à 04:20, Marika Konings a écrit :
>
> Dear All,
>
> Following on from the call today, staff has gone ahead and created two 
> (for now) possible approaches for a survey to review the candidates 
> for the RDS Review Team:
>
> ·Option 1 – See 
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=0hjSAi4ZCoUvdD2Kv0gANdf5YVqJkYkY72BakcBodNIid_2FUGWhFFHZYmxyB7zn0K 
> for a preview. This is a very straightforward approach which first 
> asks two questions in relation to whether the candidate qualifies as a 
> GNSO candidate (yes/no-don’t know) and whether the candidate has the 
> necessary expertise and competence (yes/no-don’t know), followed by a 
> ranking of the candidates. This approach is similar to the one used by 
> the volunteers that reviewed the SSR2-RT candidates.
>
> ·Option 2 – See 
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=3yLMDGyDuJTXv7WxGEXYmZTUiaAeDz3ZMxJ6g2UuNK6V0_2FXUhfilY6EjEGBvPgJQ 
> for a preview. This survey goes into a bit more detail as it asks to 
> rank the candidates based on how the meet 1) the skills and expertise 
> as outlined in the call for volunteers, and 2) the desired attributes 
> as outlined in the call for volunteers. This option could be further 
> refined by asking a ranking for each individual skill / expertise 
> and/or desired attribute, but that would make the survey significantly 
> longer and would also take you more time to complete. The aggregated 
> score could be used to obtain an overall ranking based on the 
> responses from all.
>
> Note that these two options are in preview mode – any responses will 
> not be recorded.
>
> Please share with the list which approach has your preference and/or 
> which modifications or alternative approaches should be added to this 
> list of options.
>
> Once the SSC has agreed on an approach, you will also need to decide 
> whether you intend to share the individual survey responses with the 
> SSC or only the aggregated results as well as whether you intend to 
> share these publicly. As noted on the call today, the charter foresees 
> that “To facilitate its deliberations, the SSC may decide to conduct 
> some or all of its deliberations in private, but if so, it is expected 
> to provide a rationale with its recommendations”.
>
> We would like to ask you to share your feedback as soon as possible so 
> that ideally the survey will be launched early next week to allow for 
> review and discussion of the results during next week’s meeting 
> (please remember to fill out the doodle poll that has been circulated 
> by Nathalie).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> **
>
> P.S. You will also find attached the updated summary document which 
> now includes a column for gender.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

-- 
photo 		
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> 
<http://twitter.com/safebrands>
Frédéric Guillemaut
Directeur Associé, SafeBrands

Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 
<tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 
<tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 
<tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
fg at safebrands.com <mailto:fg at safebrands.com>
Skype: mailclub1 <#>
www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com>
Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France

<https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/>

N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée 
vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en 
dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20170331/62c8102f/attachment-0001.html>