[Internal-cg] ICG FAQ ..

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All,
I agree with Milton in regard with IANA INVOKING POWER .However, I would
like to know whether the replacement of NTIA ,if any, would have the same
or would excercise the same power?
In regard with his second comment, I am not sure that we should limit
ourselcves to say  about who were are; what we do; how to respond to our
RFP; the respective roles of the ICG, operational communities, USG; how
people can get involved in any of those activities.
I do not see any problem if we could provide information on IANA, the IANA
transition, and ICANN accountability
Sorry Milton, I hope you will not be bothered by my comments
Kavouss

2014-10-02 16:47 GMT+02:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:

> Really like the way you handled Question 3.
>
> Questions 7 and 8 are in effect predicting out the outcome of the process
> and are therefore inappropriate and should be deleted. I also believe we
> should not include Question 9, as noted in my prior message.
>
> You've deleted what used to be Question 9 1/2. "Can I submit a
> proposal..." probably because you think it is answered by your new question
> 12 (How can I participate?) I object to this - I get asked the more
> specific question all the time and it relates directly to how ordinary
> people relate to the ICG and its process.
>
> I only have time now to go through the first half of the document, so I
> want to get these comments out now. Will have more comments about the
> second half later.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
> > bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Narelle Clark
> > Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 6:16 AM
> > To: internal-cg at icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ ..
> >
> >
> > Proposed edits, comments and clarifications from me attached and on the
> > dropbox. Ultimately they ended up being both simple semantic and
> > substantive in nature.
> >
> > I recommend that for ease of viewing one uses the 'Track changes' -->
> 'view
> > final' option as this is far less cluttered. After reading, switch back
> to see the
> > comments and rationale behind some of the changes.
> >
> > I also realised that there is one question I keep getting from people:
> > "Has the NTIA ever invoked its stewardship powers?" and while I have an
> > answer, I'm not convinced it is completely correct. I've included that
> one for
> > general dissection.
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> >
> > Narelle
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Narelle Clark
> > Director of Operations - Deputy CEO
> > Australian Communications
> > Consumer Action Network
> >
> > Suite 4.02 Level 4
> > 55 Mountain St
> > Ultimo NSW 2007
> > Australia
> >
> > Follow us on twitter @ACCAN_AU
> > Sign up for our weekly WebNews
> > Visit our website
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > The information contained in or attached to this message is intended
> only for
> > the people it is addressed to. If you are not the intended recipient,
> any use,
> > disclosure or copying of this information is unauthorised and
> prohibited. This
> > information may be confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you
> receive
> > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
> the e-
> > mail and any attachments. The Australian Communications Consumer Action
> > Network does not warrant that the information in this e-mail or any
> > attachments are free from any viruses, defects, errors, interception or
> > interference.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141002/9da7d89a/attachment.html>