[Latingp] Re IP Partial Response on Visual Variants

[Bill Jouris]

Dear Colleagues, 
Attached is my draft of possible responses to the IP comments on visual variants.  I have used the same [response] approach used for comments in the Proposal. 
Briefly, I think that we should continue to use the same font size that we have been using all along.  There is no question that differences, between glyphs or between diacritics, can be seen at sufficient magnification.  See the differences between breve and caron.  But we know users are not going to stop and zoom in on links.  And I think we need to push back on several of these comments on that basis. 
Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris at insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20200106/453ae1cc/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2019-12-20-Partial IP Response to Latin LGR Update-v1.1 - RESPONSE.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 62050 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/latingp/attachments/20200106/453ae1cc/2019-12-20-PartialIPResponsetoLatinLGRUpdate-v1.1-RESPONSE-0001.docx>