[Neobrahmigp] [Ext] Re: Discrepancy cross-script variant Oriya-Malayalam
Kuldeep Patnaik
kuldeep.patnaik3 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 12:54:17 UTC 2018
Thank you Pitinan,
Thank you for updating the confusable code points (not as a variant) into
Appendix in Oriya LGR proposal v2.9.
I confirm that it can be used for Public comment.
Best Regards
Kuldeep Patnaik
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <
pitinan.koo at icann.org> wrote:
> Dear Kuldeep and All,
>
> Kindly find attached the update Oriya LGR proposal v2.9.
> The confusable code points (not variant) were added into Appendix in
> section 10.5.
>
> Please review and finalization and please let us know if you confirm using
> this version for Public comment.
>
> Regards,
> Pitinan
>
> PS. There is no change in the xml or test file.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 7, 2018, at 18:40, Kuldeep Patnaik <kuldeep.patnaik3 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yes Veena,
>
> As discussed only below CP comparison table should be in the appendix.
>
> Variant Set
> Oriya
> Malayalam
> CP
> Glyph
> CP
> Glyph
> 1.
> 0B02
> ଂ
> 0D02
> ം
> 2.
> 0B03
> ଃ
> 0D03
> ഃ
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 5:04 PM, veena solomon <veena.ycet at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, this was already discussed and need to be moved to the appendix.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 4:58 PM Kuldeep Patnaik <kuldeep.patnaik3 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Pitinan,
>>>
>>> I don't agree with your suggestion to include below two code points as
>>> the variant.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Variant Set
>>> Oriya
>>> Malayalam
>>> CP
>>> Glyph
>>> CP
>>> Glyph
>>> 1.
>>> 0B02
>>> ଂ
>>> 0D02
>>> ം
>>> 2.
>>> 0B03
>>> ଃ
>>> 0D03
>>> ഃ
>>>
>>> It is because individually it might look similar to each other but not
>>> exactly same as we have 0B20 ଠ (Odia) & 0D20 ഠ (Malayalam).
>>>
>>> So, I stick with the existing proposal of Odia which has only one
>>> variant as mentioned below.
>>>
>>> Variant Set
>>> Oriya
>>> Malayalam
>>> CP
>>> Glyph
>>> CP
>>> Glyph
>>> 1.
>>> 0B20
>>> ଠ
>>> 0D20
>>> ഠ
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you all
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Kuldeep Patnaik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <
>>> pitinan.koo at icann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Kuldeep,dear Veena,
>>>>
>>>> In reviewing Malayalam proposal we found some discrepancy between the
>>>> two LGRs on cross-script variant.
>>>>
>>>> This is in Oriya proposal:
>>>>
>>>> Variant Set
>>>>
>>>> Oriya
>>>>
>>>> Malayalam
>>>>
>>>> CP
>>>>
>>>> Glyph
>>>>
>>>> CP
>>>>
>>>> Glyph
>>>>
>>>> 1.
>>>>
>>>> 0B20
>>>>
>>>> ଠ
>>>>
>>>> 0D20
>>>>
>>>> ഠ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is in Malayalam proposal :
>>>>
>>>> Variant Set
>>>>
>>>> Oriya
>>>>
>>>> Malayalam
>>>>
>>>> CP
>>>>
>>>> Glyph
>>>>
>>>> CP
>>>>
>>>> Glyph
>>>>
>>>> 1.
>>>>
>>>> 0B02
>>>>
>>>> ଂ
>>>>
>>>> 0D02
>>>>
>>>> ം
>>>>
>>>> 2.
>>>>
>>>> 0B03
>>>>
>>>> ଃ
>>>>
>>>> 0D03
>>>>
>>>> ഃ
>>>>
>>>> 3.
>>>>
>>>> 0B20
>>>>
>>>> ଠ
>>>>
>>>> 0D20
>>>>
>>>> ഠ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you please suggest what would be the final cross-script variant
>>>> set for Oriya-Malayalam.
>>>> If the table does not render properly, please find attached the current
>>>> variant definitions in both LGRs.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Pitinan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20180807/22eecde1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Oriya-LGR-20180808a.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 5692034 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20180807/22eecde1/Oriya-LGR-20180808a-0001.docx>
More information about the Neobrahmigp
mailing list