[OFB-WG] REMINDER: VOTE CREDENTIALS: ALAC Statement on Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report

Thu Jul 30 07:53:51 UTC 2020

Thank you Sebastien. Im sure we can go ahead with Bastiaan's changes.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:27 PM Sebicann Bachollet <sebicann at bachollet.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
> Thanks Bastiaan,
> I agree that your suggestion are not substantive but will help to
> understand better the document.
> May we ask Joanna, Bastiaan and Ricardo with staff to finalise the
> document before sending as a comment?
> THanks all.
> All the best
> SeB
>
> Sébastien Bachollet
> +33 6 07 66 89 33
> sebicann at bachollet.fr
> @SebBach
>
> EURALO Chair
>
>
>
>
> Le 29 juil. 2020 à 18:13, Bastiaan Goslings <b.goslings at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> Thanks, Ricardo
>
> Fyi: staff, who knew I was not going to be on the OFB call, asked me as
> co-penholder to incorporate potential comments from the group afterwards.
> Which meant I would have to listen to the recording, assuming it would be
> quickly available. No problem. Of course no one knew that the group would
> support the last version of the draft as is, but the request from staff did
> imply to me that we at least had some time to do a(nother) final review.
>
> Anyway. I understand your point that, as there were no comments from the
> OFB WG, it was agreed to ask the ALAC to ratify the statement. I saw the
> message this morning, sent at 2AM CEST.
>
> I do not really have anything to add. I will leave it to others to decide
> whether my _editorial_ suggestions, which from my perspective can easily
> and quickly be incorporated before the deadline, are worth considering.
>
> take care
> Bastiaan
>
>
> On 29 Jul 2020, at 17:54, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bastiaan,
> Yesterday, after the reading of the ATRT3 draft, there were no comments,
> thus it was agreed it will be the final draft, ready to be voted by ALAC.
> But, sure, you were part of the drafting team, and we were supposed to wait
> for you to make any arrangements after the OFBWG call. Of course there is
> the rush to vote before friday.
>
> Best
>
> Ricardo
>
> El mié., 29 jul. 2020 17:36, Bastiaan Goslings <b.goslings at gmail.com>
> escribió:
> Thanks, staff.
>
> A couple of comments, after going over the final draft before I support
> ratification.
>
> - Under point 1;
>
> 'With that, the ALAC supports the ATRT3 suggestion to introduce changes to
> the current structure of reviews, specifically by implementing a moratorium
> on launching any new Organizational and Specific Reviews until it has made
> a decision on this recommendation, as per Section 8 of the report).’
>
> I assume the ‘it’ referred to here is the ICANN board? As it reads now, to
> me, it sounds like ‘it’ refers to the ALAC
>
> As an alternative: ‘(…) , specifically by having the ICANN board implement
> a moratorium (…) until it has made a decision’ (etc)
>
>
> - With regard to point 2:
>
> This ('The ALAC fully endorses the recommendation’ (etc) does not follow
> logically from the introduction above point 1 ('we advise the ICANN Board
> to:’ and then come the 3 points)
>
> As an alternative: remove the ’The ALAC fully endorses’ and replace with
> ‘Fully endorse'. You then get 'we advise the ICANN Board to: (…)  2. Fully
> endorse’ (etc)
>
>
> - With regard to point 3:
>
> This ('The ALAC shares’ (etc) does not follow logically either from the
> introduction above point 1 ('we advise the ICANN Board to:’ and then come
> the 3 points)
>
> As an alternative: remove the ’The ALAC shares’ and replace with ’share’.
> You then get 'we advise the ICANN Board to: (…)  3. share the ATRT3 Review
> Team’s approach’ (etc)
>
>
> (To make it even more clear, the 'we advise the ICANN Board to:’ could be
> added above both points 2 and 3 as well)
>
>
> With regard to my point 2 and 3 remarks above, these of course only apply
> if we indeed want to explicitly state ''we advise the ICANN Board to’. If
> that is not the case, then we can remove the 'we advise the ICANN Board
> to:’ above point 1 and replace the ‘1. Swiftly implement ATRT3
> recommendation to evolve both specific and organizational reviews as per
> Section 8 of the final report'  with
>
> ’The ALAC is of the opinion that the ATRT3 recommendation to evolve both
> specific and organizational reviews as per Section 8 of the final report
> should be swiftly implemented’
>
>
> Hope this makes sense,
>
> regards
> Bastiaan
>
>
>
> On 29 Jul 2020, at 16:29, ICANN At-Large Staff <
> noreply-110782 at bigpulse.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Bastiaan Goslings,
>
> This is to let you know that the ALAC statement on Third Accountability
> and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report is now final. Maureen
> Hilyard, ALAC Chair, has asked the 15 ALAC members to ratify this final
> statement.
>
> To read the final statement, please visit:
> https://community.icann.org/x/X4JIC
>
> Please note that the ALAC ratification vote will open on 28 July 23:59 UTC
> and end on 31 July 2020 17:00 UTC.
>
> To access the poll click this link:
> https://www.bigpulse.com/rr?c=3Nc1AKwvOoKq5RiofTmXBoyHSiQai3sM2n5SJg
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
> Website: atlarge.icann.org
> Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge
> Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OFB-WG mailing list
> OFB-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ofb-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OFB-WG mailing list
> OFB-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ofb-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OFB-WG mailing list
> OFB-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ofb-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ofb-wg/attachments/20200729/247261e1/attachment-0001.html>