[RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] Further information on SoI/CoI

[Alan Greenberg]

No objection.  Alan
-- 
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.

On October 13, 2017 3:39:34 AM EDT, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org> wrote:
>Hello Alan,
>I have relayed your question on what constitutes an acceptable
>electronic signature to my colleagues from the legal department.
>They have advised that to reduce confusion, it would probably be best
>to forward a picture or PDF of a hand signed version.
>I think we ought to send a kind reminder to the Review Team members
>which contains all three clarifications and a step-by-step recommended
>process: 1) use print-outs received in Brussels (or print out both
>forms, if lost); 2) complete/sign both documents, 3) scan both sets of
>documents; 4) Send to ICANN org via
>rds-whois2-staff at icann.org<mailto:rds-whois2-staff at icann.org>.
>Any objections?
>Thanks
>Best
>Alice
>From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org>
>Date: Thursday 12 October 2017 at 10:05
>To: RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership <RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff at icann.org>
>Subject: Further information on SoI/CoI
>
>Dear Alan,
>
>I have obtained input from legal on the two questions you asked:
>
>*   While both affirmations state that you have received the Conflicts
>of Interest policy, the SOI affirmation also confirms that the
>representations made in the SOI are complete and truthful;
>*   For signature, handwritten is preferred but electronic is accepted.
>Hope this helps
>
>Kind regards
>
>Alice
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20171013/ab3a788a/attachment.html>