[RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] Review Needed: Webinar Slides, and ICANN63: SO/ACs Engagement Sessions

[Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu]

Dear all,

Please find attached some possible diagrams we could add. You will need to copy them into your format – sorry, I didn't manage to get rid of the Commission footer when putting the diagrams in ppt. :)

As for the presentation, I'm happy to take any part of it, or, if you think it better suited, to sit and watch and contribute where needed. Alan, perhaps you would want to do the first part of the slides in any case, as the chair.

Best regards
Cathrin


From: RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff [mailto:rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 5:44 PM
To: RDS-WHOIS2-Leadership
Subject: Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] Review Needed: Webinar Slides, and ICANN63: SO/ACs Engagement Sessions

With attachment.

At 11/09/2018 05:22 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

I have reviewed the slides and made a few changes:

Slide 9: Added origin of rejected issues.

Slide 16 under P/P replaced "and has ciloketed?" with "and now completed."

Slide 19 Safeguard: Changed reference to "first WHOIS" to Pre-GDPR WHOIS.

I would break the 2nd item on slide 39 should be broken into two. Once for ICANN63 Engagement session and a second (with the phone logo) to schedule a conference call or meeting.

We will need to decide on which Recs to highlight if we have time to do so (and not sufficient questions).

Let's discuss on call tomorrow and then put out a call to RT for who will be on the calls.

Alan


At 07/09/2018 06:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez wrote:

Dear leaders,

In anticipation of our discussion on next week’s leadership call #39<https://community.icann.org/x/FQaNBQ>, please find attached the draft webinar slides for your review. Thank you in advance for your comments and edits. We would also like to invite you to confirm speakers for this presentation and whether rapporteurs should be involved.

Following up on a skype conversation with Alan, we had indicated that we will provide you with a draft email to be sent out to SO/AC constituency stakeholders groups to suggest a meeting at ICANN63 to present the RDS-WHOIS2 Review Draft Report. However, Alan said it was decided that you would accept requests to talk to individual AC/SOs but you would not proactively offer that, as the agenda will be very tight. We looked into the decisions reached but have no recollection that the RT would not proactively offer a meeting to AC/SOs at ICANN63. Looking at the review team engagement plan, it was planned that the review team would send a note to suggest a face-to-face update. Can you please confirm how you want to proceed for ICANN63 SO/ACs engagement sessions?

Many thanks in advance,

Kind regards,

Jean-Baptiste

_______________________________________________
RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff mailing list
RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20180913/3ed9ecb9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WHOIS survey.pptx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Size: 645968 bytes
Desc: WHOIS survey.pptx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20180913/3ed9ecb9/WHOISsurvey-0001.pptx>