[RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] [Ext] RE: Engagement Opportunity with the Registration Directory Services Review Team

Thu Sep 27 21:28:56 UTC 2018

I'm afraid I cannot make a decision this moment. 
The potential problem is that this would put the 
RDS session against and RDAP session which likely has the same audience.

I will get hold of my vice-chairs immediately and 
if they think we can live with this, we will move there.

Sorry I cannot be more definite.

Alan

At 27/09/2018 04:34 PM, Tanzanica S. King wrote:
>Hi, Alan.
>
>I know it was hard to find a spot for the RDS 
>session to begin with, but I have this beautiful 
>opening in the main meeting room right after the 
>welcome ceremony that has just opened up.
>
>We could bend the rules a little and run the RDS 
>Engagement session from 1000-1100 or 1130 as 
>needed (just following the coffee break from 
>0930-1000). This would reduce the potential 
>conflict with other sessions starting at 1030 
>and allow you to join the ALAC/NCUC outreach session afterwards.
>
>Let me know what you think.
>
>Best,
>Tanzanica
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tanzanica S. King
>Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design
>ICANN
>
>Office   +1 310 301 5800
>Mobile  +1 310 995 3038
>www.icann.org
>
>From: Paul Diaz <pdiaz at pir.org>
>Date: Thursday , 27 September 2018 at 05:40
>To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>, 
>Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>
>Cc: Negar Farzinnia <negar.farzinnia at icann.org>, 
>GNSO-secs <gnso-secs at icann.org>, Tanzanica King 
><tanzanica.king at icann.org>, 
>"secretariat at rysg.info" <secretariat at rysg.info>, 
>RDS-WHOIS2-Leadership <rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff at icann.org>
>Subject: RE: FW: [Ext] RE: Engagement 
>Opportunity with the Registration Directory Services Review Team
>
>Thanks for this, Alan
>
>How about this: could the RDS-WHOIS2 session go 
>from 1100-1200 on Thursday? Unless you really 
>need 90 mins, that would allow ICANN63 
>participants to attend the beginning of the 
>Innovations session and decide if theyâ€™re 
>really interested or want to be somewhere else. Thoughts?
>
>From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:11 PM
>To: Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>
>Cc: Negar Farzinnia <negar.farzinnia at icann.org>; 
>GNSO-secs <gnso-secs at icann.org>; Tanzanica S. 
>King <tanzanica.king at icann.org>; Paul Diaz 
><pdiaz at pir.org>; secretariat at rysg.info; 
>RDS-WHOIS2-Leadership <rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff at icann.org>
>Subject: Re: FW: [Ext] RE: Engagement 
>Opportunity with the Registration Directory Services Review Team
>Importance: High
>
>It might be more effective if I address all of 
>the original recipients of Paul's message - my 
>time to handle e-mail during the EPDP meeting is 
>rather limited. So I am adding Paul, the RySG 
>Secretariat, GNSO-Secs and Tanzanica as well a RDS-WHOIS2 Leadership.
>
>The RDS-WHOIS2-RT Engagement session was 
>initially placed in conflict to the Welcome 
>Ceremony on Monday morning. That was judged to 
>not be acceptable. We were then offered a 
>session later that day, in opposition to an EPDP 
>session. That was problematic at the very least 
>for the two RT members who are also EPDP members 
>(myself and Stephanie Perrin). That EDPD session 
>was later designated as a HIT session, but was problematic before in any case.
>
>There did not seem to be a lot of other 
>opportunities and the Ry session time-slot in 
>question was one that looked viable if not 
>optimal. As far as I recall, the SO/AC/SG... 
>leaders group agreed that no sessions would be 
>officially non-conflicted, but that we would 
>schedule them early enough so that when the rest 
>of the schedule was set, we would know what, if anything, was in conflict.
>
>At this stage in scheduling, moving the session 
>is problematic: others may now be planning their 
>detailed agenda based on the current schedule, 
>and it is far from clear that there are other 
>viable options. I agree that there is a 
>possibility of confusion on the part of ICANN63 
>attendees and propose the following to circumvent this.
>
>Speaking solely on my own behalf, I would 
>suggest that we make sure that the Engagement 
>Session description makes it clear that this is 
>NOT a GDPR or EPDP session, and that at the 
>start of the session we re-iterate this to allow 
>people who are there due to a misunderstanding 
>can go down the hall to another session.
>
>My two Vice-Chairs are seeing this for the first 
>time and can comment if they wish, and I will 
>raise the issue with the entire RT (with 
>representatives from the GNSO/GAC/ALAC/Board) for their thoughts.
>
>Alan
>
>At 26/09/2018 10:42 AM, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez wrote:
>
>
>Dear Alan,
>
>Please see below the email from Paul Diaz, chair 
>of the gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group, 
>sharing concerns regarding the schedule of the 
>RDS-WHOIS2 engagement session at the same time 
>as the Ã¢€œInnovations in Top Level DomainsÃ¢€ 
>ses session on 25 Ocotber from 10.30 to 12.00.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Jean-Baptiste
>
>From: Paul Diaz <<mailto:pdiaz at pir.org>pdiaz at pir.org>
>Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 4:27 PM
>To: Jean-Baptiste Deroulez 
><<mailto:jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>, 
>"<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>gnso-secs at icann.org" 
>  <<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>gnso-secs at icann.org>, 
>"Tanzanica S. King" <<mailto:tanzanica.king at icann.org>tanzanica.king at icann.org>
>Cc: 
>"<mailto:secretariat at rysg.info>secretariat at rysg.info" 
><<mailto:secretariat at rysg.info>secretariat at rysg.info>
>Subject: [Ext] RE: Engagement Opportunity with 
>the Registration Directory Services Review Team
>
>Hello,
>
>When I shared this notice with the RySG, there 
>was an uproar about the proposed timing. We have 
>been planning under the assumption that the 
>Master Schedule was effectively Ã¢€¬œlockedÃ¢€ 
>and that the Ã¢€œInnovations in Toin Top Level 
>DomainsÃ¢€ session (25 October @ 1030-11200) would be unconflicted.
>
>On behalf of the RySG, I ask that the RDS-WHOIS2 
>engagement session NOT be scheduled in conflict 
>with the Innovations session on Thursday 
>morning. We believe thereÃ¢€™s a real risrisk 
>that ICANN63 attendees will see 
>Ã¢€œWHOISÃ¢€157; in the title and mistakenly 
>believe that these discussions will be 
>GDPR-related. Also, the Innovations session 
>planners hope that GAC reps and others who have 
>misgivings about new gTLDs will attend their 
>sessions and come to see how the 2012 round was 
>beneficial and future rounds should be, too.
>
>Please advise ASAP. I understand that the final 
>Agenda is supposed to be published on Monday (1 October).
>
>Best, P
>
>Paul A. Diaz
>Chair, gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG)
>Direct: +1 703.889.5756 | Mobile:+1 703.973.1667 | Skype: pdiazaim
>
>
>
>From: Jean-Baptiste Deroulez 
><<mailto:jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>
>Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 5:53 PM
>To: Paul Diaz <<mailto:pdiaz at pir.org>pdiaz at pir.org>
>Cc: <mailto:secretariat at rysg.info>secretariat at rysg.info
>Subject: Engagement Opportunity with the 
>Registration Directory Services Review Team
>
>The below email is sent on behalf of Alan 
>Greenberg, chair of the Registration Directory Services Review Team.
>
>Dear Paul,
>
>Registration Directory Services Review Team 
>(RDS-WHOIS2) published its Draft Report for 
>public comment on 4 September. Our draft report 
>and translations of the executive summary 
>(including recommendations) can be found at 
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_rds-2Dwhois2-2Dreview-2D2018-2D09-2D04-2Den&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=a5VfrQZP4r0Kte2xBJT17IgRyRBHECC3vHSuFP_QBqD22G4dgkHhRZBEhshbjycD&m=OIr69aLTd8YJex7RJ2WqYV1WtvnUW8dXiW6VTskEM40&s=R7sVPhGzOn0eKPhxO4tdsEToDd7fdVbpluJHxyZKgVQ&e=>https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rds-whois2-review-2018-09-04-en 
>[icann.org]. The public comment period will close on 4 November 2018.
>
>An engagement session with the RDS-WHOIS2 Review 
>Team is scheduled for ICANN63 on 25 October 2018 
>from 10:30 UTC to 12:00 UTC (tentative), where 
>participants will have the opportunity to 
>provide feedback and ask questions directly to 
>the review team on their draft report and recommendations.
>
>  The review team also held a webinar on  17 
> September 2018, you may listen to the 
> recordings available <https://community.icann.org/x/ZgmNBQ>here.
>
>Community input is key to the success of this 
>process. As such, we welcome opportunities to 
>hold additional engagement sessions. We realize 
>that ICANN63 will be a busy meeting but should 
>you have time in your meeting agenda, we will do 
>our best to have team members attend your 
>session to deliver an update and collect your 
>teamÃ¢€™s input. If interested, please send me 
><mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 
>and 
><mailto:rds-whois2-staff at icann.org>rds-whois2-staff at icann.org 
>an email to confirm your availability providing two options.
>
>I look forward to hearing from you and encourage 
>you to follow our work via 
><https://community.icann.org/x/JIfDAw>https://community.icann.org/x/JIfDAw.
>
>Many thanks,
>
>Best regards,
>
>Alan
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20180927/e0facd1f/attachment-0001.html>