[rssac-caucus] FOR REVIEW: Technical Analysis of the Naming Scheme used for Individual Root Servers

[George Michaelson]

UDP MSS? Its analogous to the TCP MSS proffered in the connection, and
influenced end-to-end by the same mechanisms of EDNS0 proffer and server
configuration. But that said, its a neologism, and would require a
definition somewhere.

It is the product of the EDNS0 activity in the DNS protocol exchange, right?

On 27 October 2016 at 05:27, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at icann.org> wrote:

> It feels weird to be the first one to comment here; I hope folks in the
> RSSAC Caucus who were not on this work party are reading the document and
> will comment soon.
>
> Having said that, an issue has been raised about the use of "MTU" in this
> document. MTU is a term of art for layer 2 and layer 3, but we are using it
> here to mean something like "maximum UDP message size I can receive". It is
> used twice in the body of the document:
>  - Page 12, second bullet
>  - Page 18, first bullet of Section 7.3
> It's also used in the tables at the back. I propose changing the use on
> page 12 and page 18 to "maximum UDP message size", but don't know what to
> put in the tables that won't get too long.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> rssac-caucus mailing list
> rssac-caucus at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20161027/82556bf4/attachment.html>