[rssac-caucus] Tweaks to RSSAC-002

[John Bond]

On 01/09/2016 04:17, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Does it make sense to document the delay in RSSAC-002? Well, not the
> entire explanation, but rather something like "Data is usually published
> within 7 days."
Speaking for my self i don't think that the RSSAC document should
contain statements from specific operators.  perhaps a more generic
statement like

 'operators may delay publication of data by up to x days'
or
  'Operators are required to publish data within x days'

Cheers John