[tech-whois] A follow up session in San Francisco?

[Sean Shen 沈烁]

+1

Although I won’t be able to go to San Francisco, I would like to join the session remotely.

 

Sean

 

From: tech-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:tech-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Eugen Staicut
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 3:44 PM
To: Steve Sheng; tech-whois at icann.org
Subject: Re: [tech-whois] A follow up session in San Francisco?

 

I would be interested to attend to presentations about  IRIS and RWS. 

 

Eugenie Staicut 

 

> Dear all, 

> 

>   We had a successful workshop in Cartagena last year. Thinking 

> ahead for the San Francisco meeting, we would like to ask if there 

> would be any interest in scheduling a follow up session in San 

> Francisco. Particularly we thought about inviting IRIS and RWS 

> authors and implementers to come and give presentations about their 

> experience, and then engage a discussion on the technical evolution 

> of WHOIS. 

> 

>   If there is sufficient interest, we can request a slot in the San 

> Francisco meeting and invite speakers to come. 

> 

> Warm regards, 

> 

> -- 

> Steve Sheng 

> Senior Technical Analyst 

> 

> ICANN 

> Internet Corporation for 

> Assigned Names and Numbers 

> P:  +1 (310) 578 8607 

> C:  +1 (310) 463 8430 

> www.icann.org 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> On 1/7/11 9:27 AM, "Steve Sheng" <steve.sheng at icann.org> wrote: 

> 

> FYI. Comments from Hugo Salgado regarding the Technical Evolution of 

> the Whois Service document. We welcome any additional comments. 

> 

> Any thoughts / responses to Hugo's comment? 

> 

> Warm regards, 

> Steve 

> 

> ------ Forwarded Message 

> From: Hugo Salgado <hsalgado at nic.cl> 

> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:16:46 -0800 

> To: Francisco Arias <francisco.arias at icann.org> 

> Subject: Comments on Technical Evolution of the Whois Service 

> 

> Dear Francisco. 

> I'd like to comment the "Technical Evolution of the Whois Service 

> Preliminary Draft, 15 November 2010" document that you presented 

> in 39th ICANN's meeting, that I obtained through this link: 

> 

> <http://cartagena39.icann.org/meetings/cartagena2010/presentation-te 

> ch-evolu 

> tion-whois-service-15nov10-en.pdf> 

> 

> 1. I think there's a fourth point in the 3 deficiencies of the 

> WHOIS 

>    protocol that are enumerated in page 3, under "Extending the 

> existing 

>    WHOIS protocol:" subtitle. That's the "Referrals" item. Even when 

> is 

>    mentioned in the RWhois description and as a implicit benefit of 

> the 

>    HTTP protocol, I believe is of great importance and should be one 

> of 

>    the key requirement of an improved whois, whatever solution will 

> be. 

> 

> 2. IMHO there's a chance of another option for improving whois: 

> create a 

>    new "application-transport" layer in IRIS (such as BEEP and LWZ) 

> that 

>    uses HTTP. In that way you benefit from the data standarization 

> of 

>    IRIS (request/response format, schemas, entities) and the work 

> of 

>    the IETF, and you gain all the benefits of using RWS with the 

>    existing web infrastructure and expertise. We can ask for 

> guidance 

>    of the IRIS authors and write a draft, and maybe reopen the 

> CRISP 

>    WG in the IETF. 

> 

> 

> My 2 cents. 

> 

> Saludos y un feliz año 2011! 

> 

> -- 

> Hugo Salgado 

> NIC Chile - .CL 

> 

> 

> 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tech-whois/attachments/20110127/e3bc35a7/attachment-0001.html