[IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report

Fri Sep 18 13:10:31 UTC 2015

All,

Thank you for the input. We need to figure out how to include other views without confusing the community as to which text has overall support from the IAG. One way to do this would be to include an appendix entitled “Other IAG member views” and then include each statement in the appendix. For example, Christopher’s Appendix 3 would be inserted in this "Other views” appendix as would Stephanie’s. Christopher’s edits to the body of the report that do not enjoy majority support or conflict with previously expressed views would not be included except to the extent that they appear in the “Other views” appendix. The appendix sections would not be characterized as “minority statements” until a consensus final document is produced, taking into account the public comment.

Does this seem reasonable? If so, Stephanie could you please submit your paper as soon as possible and Christopher, could you please indicate whether you want to add anything from your text edits to your Appendix 3? Thanks.

Best,
Jamie

Jamie Hedlund
VP, Strategic Programs
Global Domains Division
ICANN
+1.202.374.3969 (m)
+1.202.570.7125 (d)
jamie.hedlund at icann.org

From: <whois-iag-volunteers-bounces at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca<mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 19:12
To: "whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>" <whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report

My apologies for not getting my comments in by now. I have been preoccupied with the birth of my first grandchild, and while I am dedicated to ICANN this has not been top of mind.  Can you tell me what the deadline is for receiving a statement from me, which might be an appendix or a stakeholder view or a minority report.  Frankly my priority is to have it included, although I  do have sympathy for Chris's position re voting and minority views.
Kind regards, Stephanie Perrin

On 2015-09-17 14:37, Jamie Hedlund wrote:
Thank you, Allen.

In light of the extensive edits, please review and indicate whether you have any concerns or objections. Thank you.

Best,
Jamie

Jamie Hedlund
VP, Strategic Programs
Global Domains Division
ICANN
+1.202.374.3969 (m)
+1.202.570.7125 (d)
jamie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>

From: Allen Grogan <<mailto:allen.grogan at icann.org>allen.grogan at icann.org<mailto:allen.grogan at icann.org>>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 14:31
To: Jamie Hedlund <<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>jamie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>>, Christopher Wilkinson <cw at christopherwilkinson.eu<mailto:cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>>
Cc: "<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>" <whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report

Can't guarantee the accuracy, but I believe the attached redline reflects the changes proposed by Christopher.  Note that some language consisting of hyperlinks in the original document shows up here in blue (meaning it looks like it is a change to the document even though it isn't).

Regards,

Allen R. Grogan
Chief Contract Compliance Officer
direct:  + 1 310 578-8932
mobile: +1 310 795-8206
allen.grogan at icann.org<mailto:allen.grogan at icann.org>

12025 Waterfront Drive
Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
United States of America

From: <<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers-bounces at icann.org>whois-iag-volunteers-bounces at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 11:14 AM
To: Christopher Wilkinson <cw at christopherwilkinson.eu<mailto:cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>>
Cc: "<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>" <whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report

Christopher,

I will do my best to identify your changes.

Regarding your Appendix 3 and other requests to provide a minority statement, it does not seem appropriate to include these in a document on which public comment is sought. Rather, minority statements are incorporated into final reports. At that point, public comments have been considered and the group has identified where there is consensus. It would be appropriate for minority views to be submitted as public comment. If, after taking into account the universe of public comments, these views do not generate consensus support, they would be ripe for attachment to the final report as minority statements.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thank you.

Best,
Jamie

Jamie Hedlund
VP, Strategic Programs
Global Domains Division
ICANN
+1.202.374.3969 (m)
+1.202.570.7125 (d)
<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>jamie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>

From: Christopher Wilkinson <cw at christopherwilkinson.eu<mailto:cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 14:00
To: Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>>
Cc: "<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>" <whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report

No, Jamie, there are a number of amendments and additions in the body of the text.

Since your version is in .docx and my edits are in .odt, track changes does not seem to work.
(I do not know how to do 'red-lining')

I suggest that if you do a 'compare documents' you will get the changes.

Otherwise: Search for 'N.B.'  and for 'applicable'' and you will get most of them.

Regards

CW

On 17 Sep 2015, at 19:50, Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>> wrote:

Christopher,

Thank you. Could you please confirm that the only change you made to the base text was the addition of Appendix 3? Since the document is not redlined I wanted to make sure we captured your proposed edits. Thanks again.

Best,
Jamie

Jamie Hedlund
VP, Strategic Programs
Global Domains Division
ICANN
+1.202.374.3969 (m)
+1.202.570.7125 (d)
<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>jamie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>

From: Christopher Wilkinson <<mailto:cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>cw at christopherwilkinson.eu<mailto:cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 13:24
To: Jamie Hedlund <<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>jamie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>>
Cc: "<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>" <whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report

Good evening:

Please find attached my edits to the draft preliminary report.

With many thanks for your attention

Regards

Christopher Wilkinson

_______________________________________________
Whois-iag-volunteers mailing list
Whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org<mailto:Whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-iag-volunteers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150918/d0dfeec3/attachment-0001.html>