[WP1] Proposed work approach in June - volunteers?

Tue Jun 2 04:36:16 UTC 2015

Hi,

While I may be late for the first meeting due to a doctor's appt, I
should be able to make these meetings.

I am willing to participate in a online pre-process, but due to other
writing commitments (the paying kind) I cannot take responsibility for
any of pieces.

avri

On 31-May-15 00:40, Jordan Carter wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Roelof - I think this is largely sensible. I will spend some time with
> staff to understand exactly what will come out of the public comments
> tool.
>
> In the meantime - *this is a call for volunteers.*
> *
> *
> *Who would like to do some work in a sub-team format in the period
> 7-12 June, to help with the preparation of draft material for WP1 to
> consider re the comments in our area?*
> *
> *
> It will probably be an online process, and will start when the
> comments report is available from staff on ~7 June, and finish
> probably around the time the WP1 meetings are happening to go through
> the material.
>
> It would be helpful if volunteers can spend a bit of time on this and
> are good at analysing and organising text.
>
> This sub-team work will _make no decisions_* - all* decisions will as
> usual be made in the full WP1 meetings.
>
> Let me know on or off list if you'd like to help, and if you could
> also distinguish your areas of preferred involvement, that would be great.
>
> thanks,
> Jordan
>
>
> On 21 May 2015 at 21:11, Roelof Meijer <Roelof.Meijer at sidn.nl
> <mailto:Roelof.Meijer at sidn.nl>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Jordan,
>
>     That approach should work and I can’t think of anything that would
>     work (significantly) better.
>     I suggest that the first exercise that some of us as a sub-team
>     do, is categorize the comments. Possible categories: comments on
>     mechanisms, comments on powers, comments on (AoC in) bylaws etc.
>     And that we then assign a category or multiple categories to
>     subteams to do both the analysis and the initial thinking of a way
>     forward. In this way, not all of us will have to go through all
>     the comments, we can do a lot of work in a relatively short
>     timespan and if the subteams present at the F2F sessions, those
>     can be quite effective.
>     How does that sound?
>
>     best,
>
>     Roelof
>
>     From: Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>     <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>>
>     Date: woensdag 20 mei 2015 22:45
>     To: "wp1 at icann.org <mailto:wp1 at icann.org>" <wp1 at icann.org
>     <mailto:wp1 at icann.org>>
>     Subject: [WP1] WP1 - proposed work approach 7-16 June
>
>     Dear WP1 members,
>
>     This email sets out how I propose we do our next piece of work.
>     Please read and offer your comments.
>
>     We are getting public comments back from our comment period 6-7
>     June, and then have a CCWG meeting on 9 June to look at the input
>     and decide where to focus.
>
>     The work approach agreed at the last CCWG call asked Work Parties
>     to take the lead in analysing feedback on the specific parts of
>     the comment report, identifying where there was broad support,
>     where there were questions to be answered, and where there was
>     disagreement and other alternatives needed to be explored.
>
>     The outcome of this work, by 16 June, is some documentation of the
>     above points along with some ideas about how to keep the
>     conversation going with the ICANN community in Buenos Aires. 
>
>     That is, we don't have to come up with proposals to address all
>     the feedback, but we do need to be able to propose to CCWG how to
>     deal with the discussions on the ground at ICANN 53.
>
>     To my mind the most logical way for us to do this work is for
>     rapporteur or volunteers to take the task of preparing initial
>     thinking on those matters, and then discuss them across a few
>     meetings.
>
>     We have identified the weekend of 13/14 June as the time for these
>     meetings to be held, with WP1 and WP2 and ST-WP meetings not clashing.
>
>     I don't know how much feedback we will get but I think it is
>     prudent for us to schedule three WP1 meetings over that
>     Friday-Sunday period 12-14 June, each of 2 hrs.
>
>     Hopefully we will only need two of the meetings. If we get a huge
>     flood of feedback in the second half of the comment period, we
>     might need more.
>
>     I would appreciate your *comments* on this approach, and I will
>     work with staff to propose three meetings that are at different
>     times of day so that people all have a chance to participate no
>     matter where they live.
>
>
>     Look forward to your thoughts!
>
>     best
>     Jordan
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> /A better world through a better Internet /
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com