[WP2] this is the document we'll use for our discussion of the IRP

[David Post]

I continue to think that it is a bad idea to have 
this body meet in panels of 3, rather than having 
the full 7-member Review Board hear all 
claims.  The institution needs the opportunity to 
meet and deliberate together as a single body if 
it is to develop the kind of institutional weight 
that it should have (and probably has to have) if 
it is to serve as an effective check on the 
Board.  Splitting it up this way just dilutes its voice.

And I'm not clear what "Process for selection 
from pre-vetted pool to respond to capacity 
issues – all panels will be chaired by a member 
of the standing panel " means, exactly.  Is this 
a proposal to allow members of some "standby" 
pool to hear claims if there are "capacity 
issues" with the 7-member Review Board?  If so, I 
think that's also not a very good idea, for many 
of the same reasons as the above.  I don't think 
it's a good idea to give the power to invalidate 
Board action to some "standby" arbitrator, who 
may (or may not) have ever dealt with a 
DNS-related claim before, and who may never do so 
again, but who is called into duty on a one-off 
basis.  I think that setting it up this way 
seriously detracts from the seriousness and importance of the undertaking.

David

At 06:43 AM 7/22/2015, Burr, Becky wrote:

>J. Beckwith Burr
>
>Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
>
>1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
>
>Office: + 
>1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / 
><mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz>becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
>Content-Type: 
>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;
>         name="Constitutional Court charged with 
> determining whether ICANN has"
>  acted.docx"
>Content-Description: Constitutional Court charged with determining whether
>  ICANN has acted.docx
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Constitutional Court charged with"
>  determining whether ICANN has acted.docx"; size=109908;
>         creation-date="Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:43:20 GMT";
>         modification-date="Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:43:20 GMT"
>Content-ID: <51A35160F2A36C429B7F31CDD2DE998F at neustar.biz>
>
>_______________________________________________
>WP2 mailing list
>WP2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2

*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose)  http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
music 
http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic  publications 
etc.  http://www.davidpost.com
*******************************  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150722/2a3f1df9/attachment.html>