[Ws2-hr] red line

[Rudolph Daniel]

I have some difficulty with  'could consider'......as there seems to be no
intent....'should consider' ,  in my view ..goes some way towards a
consensus,  but puts the decision firmly into the hands of ICANN... Using
the formation that follows...(?)
rd

On Aug 8, 2017 5:55 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's a redline.
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Original text:
>>
>> When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also
>> consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human
>> Rights.  However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and
>> implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s
>> annual reporting.
>>
>> Text proposed by me on the call:
>>
>> When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider
>> using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as
>> HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
>> However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
>> appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN
>> the organization's analysis should be reflected in
>> ICANN’s annual reporting.
>>
>> I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>> --
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>>
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org
>>
>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-hr mailing list
>> Ws2-hr at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20170808/9a5ff22a/attachment.html>