[Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: Jurisdiction Subgroup: The (Revised) Path Forward

[Thiago Braz Jardim Oliveira]

Dear Greg,

Please correct me if I'm mistaken. As far as I'm aware of, the subgroup has NOT (at least not yet) chosen to limit the number of issues there will be in any final report. So, to my understanding, your suggestion that "we will need to select a handful of issues (likely, 2 to 4)" goes beyond what has been discussed or even hinted at by the subgroup. In fact, with regard to the more basic question as to the number of issues each participant are to suggest for consideration (obviously all with the expectation that they will be retained in a final report to the extent possible), there was NOT significant support for your initial proposed path that would have limited it to "one man/woman one issue".

So I'd encourage us not to put the cart before the horse (again) and try to be as efficient as possible in the treatment of the issues participants will have proposed. This could probably lead us to have in a final report more than the "likely, 2 to 4" issues that you suggest, which number the subgroup has never even suggested would be satisfactory.

Best,

Thiago

PS: on a related note, it is regrettable that the message to the list informing all participants that they will have until the 21 August to post issues for consideration was only sent on the very 21 August.



________________________________
De: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] em nome de Greg Shatan [gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
Enviado: segunda-feira, 21 de agosto de 2017 0:32
Para: ws2-jurisdiction
Cc: acct-staff at icann.org
Assunto: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Subgroup: The (Revised) Path Forward

At our 16 August meeting, we discussed the initial “Path Forward” proposal and various comments from participants.  We arrived at the following approach to produce Subgroup recommendations.
11 October Deadline:

•         Based on the overall timeline for Work Stream 2, the Subgroup has until 11 October to submit a draft report and set of recommendations to the Plenary for first reading.

•         In other words, we have about seven (7) weeks to develop a draft set of issues and recommendations and come to consensus on these.
A Handful of Issues: We will need to select a handful of issues (likely, 2 to 4) which:

•         Are within our remit.

•         Will result in recommendations that achieve consensus in the Subgroup.
The Challenge: Everyone will have to compromise in order to finalize this limited number of issues over the next very few weeks and work diligently at meetings and on the list to develop recommendations for these particular issues.
The Method: Participants should each present one or more issues (with proposed solutions) which they believe are in scope for the Subgroup

•         If you present more than one issue, please prioritize them (e.g., 1, 2, 3)

•         Post the issue statement(s) to the list by 23:59 on 21 August for discussion at our meeting of 23 August.

•         Issues should be very specific -- avoid open-ended, abstract or omnibus issues.

•         All proposed issue statements should include one or more proposed solutions.

•         Issue and solution descriptions should be succinct -- 12 standard lines maximum (each).

•         Send your issue statement to the email list or put it on the Google sheet:

o   Use a new email (not a reply), with the subject ISSUE: [name of issue].

o   Google sheet is here: MailScanner has detected definite fraud in the website at "docs.google.com". Do not trust this website: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zAMj3Oz8TEqbjauOyqt09Ef-1ada9TrC7i60Mk-7al4/edit?usp=sharing<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zAMj3Oz8TEqbjauOyqt09Ef-1ada9TrC7i60Mk-7al4/edit?usp=sharing>

•  If you put your issue on the Google sheet, notify the email list.

•         If another participant proposes an issue you wanted to propose, simply post your support for that issue statement.

Thank you.

Greg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170821/8a8f0092/attachment-0001.html>