[Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: Back to the (Proposed) Issues: New Proposed Issues Spreadsheet

[Greg Shatan]

All,

No one has yet responded by adding proposed issues to the *Proposed Issues
List*.  (I recognized that this was sent around on a Friday
afternoon/evening, but I am asking for existing work to be transferred (as
well as new work added).

There certainly have been proposed issues raised in the group, so I can't
imagine this will stay empty for long.  It would be preferable if each
participant entered in contributions related to them (e.g., contributions
in prior documents, litigation summaries prepared, questionnaire responses
submitted or reviewed, prior emails and interventions, blog posts, etc.).
I expect to go through all the materials to fill in the gaps with issues
that didn't get put on the list -- but that will be a much more reasonable
task if I'm filling the gaps rather than filling an empty spreadsheet.

The link is below.  Even a sparse summary will be better than nothing.

Thanks!

Greg
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:13 PM
Subject: Back to the (Proposed) Issues: New Proposed Issues Spreadsheet
To: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>


All,

As many have said, it's time to get back to the issues.  To do that, I
think it would be very helpful to have in one place all of the proposed
issues (i.e., things that you believe are issues or that you saw raised,
e.g., in a questionnaire response or analysis of a response, in analyzing
one of ICANN's litigation matters).  Remember that we are looking for
positive impacts as well as negative impacts, even though we're using the
term "Issues."

To do that, I've created a Google Drive spreadsheet entitled "List of
Proposed Issues for Jurisdiction Subgroup Consideration," where each of us
can submit our proposed issues.  Filling out the first 4-5 columns will be
sufficient for now.  Here's the link:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zAMj3Oz8TEqbjauOyqt09Ef-
1ada9TrC7i60Mk-7al4/edit?usp=sharing

As an initial matter, I would ask that you refrain from editing other
people's proposed issues unless expressly invited by the submitter.
Instead, use the columns further to the right to register your views.
While the "accepted" issues may end up being joint creations, I'd like the
initial drafts of the proposed issues to reflect the views of the submitter.

Thank you for your entries.  This is the first step in what should be a
more focused process of working on the issues.

Greg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170619/5bd7f957/attachment.html>