[CCWG-ACCT] initial legal responses to our questions

[Robin Gross]

What is the estimated timeline by which CCWG can hire its own lawyers to get an independent non-conflicted viewpoint?   If it is much longer, we should do it sans ICANN legal staff "assistance".

Thanks,
Robin


On Feb 8, 2015, at 1:43 AM, Thomas Rickert wrote:

> All,
> may I kindly ask we discuss this subject tomorrow during our session?
> 
> Remember, we got this initial legal feedback because we asked for it. We did not want to wait until our legal sub team has finished its work on a scoping document.
> 
> We will discuss the topic tomorrow, which will be the ideal opportunity to exchange thoughts and avoid further misunderstandings. At least the document has stimulated a discussion on potential outcomes.
> 
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150208/1d2ec325/signature.asc>