[CCWG-ACCT] Membership thoughts

[Seun Ojedeji]

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 24 Jan 2015 11:50, "Dr Eberhard W Lisse" <el at lisse.na> wrote:
>
<snip>

Now you have written what looks like reason below, which makes it a helpful
response to the question asked.

Thanks
>
> In any case and notwithstanding that my position on the regional
organization(s) has been well documented for well over 8 years, as not all
ccTLD Managers are members of a RO, even a legitimate RO can only represent
represent its members.
>
> This is consistent with my repeatedly stated position that AC/SOs can not
be come "members" as they do not represent all TLDs.
>
>
> Even to the the most cursory observer it should be obvious that adding
unaccountable "members" will not increase Accountability.
>
> el
>
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
>
> On Jan 24, 2015, at 12:23, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The question was:
>>
>> " Could you explain your reasoning so that we can better understand your
position? "
>>
>> And your response is that you "fundamentally" oppose it... Perhaps you
can do better in giving reason.
>>
>> Thanks
>> sent from Google nexus 4
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>
> [...]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150124/b6da5c6d/attachment.html>