[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] New section - ICANN Community Assembly

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Another waffle-shop must be in place before the transition can take place? 

Or even after?

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On Jul 27, 2015, at 16:29, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> 
> May I suggest that we defer the ICA (or whatever it evolves into) to WS2. 
> 
> I think an interesting discussion is evolving, but we don't need to have it now, and I particularly think that it requires more careful thought.
> 
> Let's just say there will be a recommendation in WS2 as to how to structure the community discussion leading up to multiple petitions (if required for a single power) and post-petition and prior to voting.
> 
> We will not likely need this powers in the coming months, and if we do, some sort of community discussion will happen regardless of us architecting it or not.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 24/07/2015 10:57 PM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>> Hi all
>> 
>> I have taken the draft material from an older paper about the ICANN Community Assembly and pulled it into one place.
>> 
>> Please see attached and debate away!  I've tried to be clear on its solely advisory nature, and have suggested that this would be the forum to use for the Public Accountability Forum suggestion made by advisors a while ago.
>> 
>> 
>> best,
>> Jordan
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jordan Carter

[...]