[CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Minority Reports
Dr Eberhard Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Thu Jul 30 11:34:07 UTC 2015
Thank you,
Thunderbird is getting the better of me :-)-O
Now we are saying we only do what we are not afraid of rather than what
is right?
el
On 2015-07-30 11:38, Jordan Carter wrote:
> Hi Eberhard,
>
> It appears you are posting to a list that isn't the CCWG list - I'm
> posting to the same, I don't know who is on it.
>
> You do seem to have a radically different idea as to what the purpose of
> the group was. If we had started intervening in the things that Keith
> listed as us not doing, all hell would surely have broken loose?
>
> best
> Jordan
>
>
> On 30 July 2015 at 20:03, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.na
> <mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:
>
> Dear Co-Chairs,
>
> I am going to quote the first paragraph in my minority viewpoint because
> it explains the failure of the CCWG Accountability in two sentences.
>
> The second paragraph, which I have separated from the first for ease of
> reference is painfully absurd.
>
> greetings, el
>
> On 2015-07-30 07:09, Drazek, Keith wrote:
> [...]
> > I think it's also important to note the proposal currently under
> > discussion changes nothing about ICANN's day-to-day,
> > month-to-month, or even year-to-year operations and community
> > engagement structures. Only in very rare cases would the proposed
> > Sole Member community empowerment model come into play.
>
>
> > In my opinion, its existence would be a powerful deterrent to bad
> > behavior and would therefore become an available but largely
> > unneeded tool.
> [...]
>
> --
[...]
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list