[CCWG-ACCT] Edits due in 3h: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC

Olga Cavalli olgacavalli at gmail.com
Sat May 2 14:06:48 UTC 2015


Dear all,
thanks for the draft.
I support Kavouss comments and suggested edits.
Regards
Olga

2015-05-02 4:35 GMT-03:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> IMPORTANT AND URGENT
>
> Dear co-chairs,
>
> Thank you very much for your enormous and tireless efforts to put this
> doc. for final comments
>
> I have had many comments but I could not finish the edits till now.
>
> I therefore do not wish to delay the work.
>
> However, I have one VERY IMPORTANT edit that I raised it in my last e-mail.
>
> That edit is relating to a reference to ICANN or Internet Process as being
> «private led  multistakeholder”  organization or process.
>
> This is a mistake. a big mistake. There is no such preference to one
> category of stakeholder over other categories of stakeholder (private or
> public) .
>
> I raised this matter at one of our call and asked for deletion of that
> term.
>
> All stakeholder, irrespective being private, public, and etc. *SHALL * be
> treated equally. This issue was raised at various occasions by NTIA
> indicating / emphasizing that no single category of the stakeholder should
> benefit from preference over other categories of stakeholders .This term
> was used at very early stage of the introduction of the ICANN into the
> business. Over the time when we discussed that the process should be
> inclusive, democratic, then it was agreed by everybody that no category of
> the stakeholder should have any preference, what so ever, or should have
>  a preferred treatment over other categories of the stakeholders.
>
> In view of the above, I urge you to  kindly correct such a big mistake
> which if it is not corrected would put us in a very delicate situation that
> we did not respect impartiality and neutrality in treating  various
> categories of the stakeholders.
>
> There are 4 or 5 times that such a reference to »private led
> multistakeholder  are referred to in the doc.
>
> Pls kindly make a simple «find" check and delete all that.  Term in other
> part of doc. whenever, so as reference is maded to multistakeholder there
> is no such an incorrect and discriminative preference.
>
> Regards
>
> Kavouss
>
> 2015-05-02 9:01 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear All,
>> I have not finish edits .I am on page 50. However, in view of time time
>> constrain, I have an important edit that is attached.
>> The same edit should be carried forward elsewhere  throughout the entire
>> document . please then search for " private sector led " and DELETE THAT .
>> I mentioned in one of the call .See Attached doc.
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> 2015-05-02 3:34 GMT+02:00 Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>:
>>
>>>  Thanks Grace.
>>>
>>>  Dear CCWG,
>>> Attached please find some proposed edits for consideration.
>>>
>>>  Best,
>>>
>>>  Sam
>>>
>>>   From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
>>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 3:52 PM
>>> To: Accountability Cross Community <
>>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Edits due in 3h: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2
>>> May at 01:00 UTC
>>>
>>>   Hi all,
>>> Just a reminder than edits, comments are due in approximately 3h. Thank
>>> you to those who sent edits earlier today.  If you must send late edits,
>>> please send a note to the Chairs* with staff in copy* to give us notice
>>> that your comments will be delayed. Best to stick to the deadline, but we
>>> know everyone is working hard to get this draft report ready, and we’d
>>> rather get your comments than not at all.
>>> Have a good weekend,
>>> Grace
>>>
>>>   From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
>>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM
>>> To: Accountability Cross Community <
>>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>>> Subject: Re: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC
>>>
>>>   Dear all,
>>>
>>>  We sent the V10 draft report earlier today (in UTC) but have been
>>> notified that, in some cases, the files are too large to download from the
>>> email attachments. As a reminder, the draft (redline and clean versions)
>>> are posted on the Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Draft+Report.
>>>
>>>  Looking forward to receiving your comments and edits,
>>> Grace
>>>
>>>   From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
>>> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:22 PM
>>> To: Accountability Cross Community <
>>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>>> Subject: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC
>>>
>>>   Dear all,
>>>
>>>  Here attached is the CCWG-Accountability Draft Report V10. I have
>>> attached a redline and a clean version (in Word and PDF).
>>>
>>>  Version 10 incorporates the following:
>>>
>>>    - Changes from the CCWG-Accountability call on Thursday 30 April at
>>>    05:00 UTC
>>>    - Edits from legal counsel (Sidley and Adler)
>>>    - Approval from the CWG-Stewardship Chairs/Client Committee
>>>    regarding incorporation of CWG-Stewardship recommendations
>>>    - Edits from Chairs and Rapporteurs
>>>
>>> Please send your edits, comments, etc to the mailing list by*Saturday 2
>>> May 01:00 UTC* (24h from now). Staff will incorporate the edits over
>>> the weekend so as to release a final version for Public Comment on Monday,
>>> 4 May. *If possible, edits are appreciate in track changes in the clean
>>> version so that they are clearly marked and visible. *There will be
>>> professional formatting and copyediting done before publication, so we
>>> suggest that your time my be best spent by focusing on the
>>> substance-related edits.
>>>
>>>  Also, please remember to submit your feedback regarding the XPlane
>>> graphics by Saturday as well. Adam will send a reminder re: XPlane.
>>>
>>>  Almost there!
>>> — Grace
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150502/9b33334f/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list